2015
DOI: 10.1113/jp270358
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ClC‐1 mutations in myotonia congenita patients: insights into molecular gating mechanisms and genotype–phenotype correlation

Abstract: Key pointsr Loss-of-function mutations of the skeletal muscle ClC-1 channel cause myotonia congenita with variable phenotypes.r Using patch clamp we show that F484L, located in the conducting pore, probably induces mild dominant myotonia by right-shifting the slow gating of ClC-1 channel, without exerting a dominant-negative effect on the wild-type (WT) subunit.r Molecular dynamics simulations suggest that F484L affects the slow gate by increasing the frequency and the stability of H-bond formation between E23… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(91 reference statements)
2
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In hClC‐1, the CBS2 domain encompasses residues 820 to 871 (Estévez et al., ; Hebeisen et al., ) and has been predicted to play a role in channel gating. Indeed, structural studies on ClC‐1 suggested that the long intracellular C‐terminal portion is folded in such a manner that the CBS2 domain may directly interact with the α‐helix R containing Tyr578 residue, which participates directly in Cl − coordination during transport (Feng et al., ; Imbrici et al., ). Moreover, several mutations occurring in CBS2 have been shown to cause changes in channel voltage dependence, and a mutant with a particularly strong effect, p.His835Arg, displayed a dominant‐negative effect on WT in coexpression studies, suggesting an alteration of the common gate (Estévez et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In hClC‐1, the CBS2 domain encompasses residues 820 to 871 (Estévez et al., ; Hebeisen et al., ) and has been predicted to play a role in channel gating. Indeed, structural studies on ClC‐1 suggested that the long intracellular C‐terminal portion is folded in such a manner that the CBS2 domain may directly interact with the α‐helix R containing Tyr578 residue, which participates directly in Cl − coordination during transport (Feng et al., ; Imbrici et al., ). Moreover, several mutations occurring in CBS2 have been shown to cause changes in channel voltage dependence, and a mutant with a particularly strong effect, p.His835Arg, displayed a dominant‐negative effect on WT in coexpression studies, suggesting an alteration of the common gate (Estévez et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Open probability for common gating ( P o common) was obtained by using a similar protocol to that for the overall P o (200 ms conditioning pulse), except that an extra 400 μs activation pulse to +180 mV was added before stepping to −105 mV (Imbrici et al., , ). This very positive step fully activates the fast gates of the channel and the tail currents at −105 mV then reflect only slow gating.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Все клинические проявления находились в зоне перекрытия фенотипов МТ и МБ, что не способствовало уточнению нозоло-гии. Опираться только на клинические признаки при дифференциальной диагностике МТ и МБ нельзя, так как в одной семье у больных с одинаковыми мутациями выраженность симптомов варьирует в широких преде-лах, а в последних обзорах все чаще авторы не находят статистически значимых клинических отличий между МТ и МБ [7,[19][20][21][22].…”
Section: том 6 Volunclassified