2019
DOI: 10.21692/haps.2019.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clay Modeling in a Sophomore-Level Anatomy Laboratory: Will Active Learning Improve Student Performance?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Formative assessments caused minimal improvement in the final exam performance and the researchers concluded that the ineffective feedback provided in the assessments did not empower students to improve their achievement. Additionally, another study by Carlson, Chandra, Hobbs, and Steele (2019) that used clay modelling as an active learning strategy did not reveal any significant improvement in exam performance, while indicating that time restrictions, group dynamics, and task instructions could be factors hindering the desired outcome.…”
Section: Students' Performancementioning
confidence: 96%
“…Formative assessments caused minimal improvement in the final exam performance and the researchers concluded that the ineffective feedback provided in the assessments did not empower students to improve their achievement. Additionally, another study by Carlson, Chandra, Hobbs, and Steele (2019) that used clay modelling as an active learning strategy did not reveal any significant improvement in exam performance, while indicating that time restrictions, group dynamics, and task instructions could be factors hindering the desired outcome.…”
Section: Students' Performancementioning
confidence: 96%
“…Clay modeling has been identified as an effective active learning tool in anatomy education, though its impact varies. Studies have shown its benefits in enhancing understanding and engaging students, but its effectiveness depends on the implementation and student preferences [18][19][20] (Kooloos et al, 2014;Curlewis et al, 2020). 21,22 To investigate this, we will conduct a comparative study examining the differences in students' geometrical mental representations formed through verbal descriptions alone and those enhanced after a tactile interaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clay modeling has been identified as an effective active learning tool in anatomy education, though its impact varies. Studies have shown its benefits in enhancing understanding and engaging students, but its effectiveness depends on the implementation and student preferences 18‐20 (Kooloos et al., 2014; Curlewis et al., 2020) 21,22 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, we find several active methodologies that vary according to their purpose, which may be focused on developing students’ three‐dimensional perception skills (Carlson et al, 2019; Fairén González et al, 2017), stimulating competitiveness in a playful way (Burleson & Olimpo, 2016) or even encourage work in small and/or large groups (Bruno et al, 2016; Martínez & Tuesca, 2014; McBride & Drake, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%