2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.115116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clay content prediction using spectra data collected from the ground to space platforms in a smallholder tropical area

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model performance obtained from the S2A_S image was superior to that obtained by [6], who also used the ten bands of the Sentinel-2A (S2A) and a PLSR model. Similar results were obtained by [8] using Sentinel-2 MSI and Landsat-8 OLI images for clay content prediction, with R 2 values of 0.68 and 0.62, respectively. Moreover, [29] also found similar performance using the MLR model and nine bands of the ASTER image, while [55] obtained a high prediction accuracy of soil clay content using a mean spectral reflectance from bare soil pixels along a Landsat-TM time series.…”
Section: Clay Predictions Depending On the Multispectral Sensorsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The model performance obtained from the S2A_S image was superior to that obtained by [6], who also used the ten bands of the Sentinel-2A (S2A) and a PLSR model. Similar results were obtained by [8] using Sentinel-2 MSI and Landsat-8 OLI images for clay content prediction, with R 2 values of 0.68 and 0.62, respectively. Moreover, [29] also found similar performance using the MLR model and nine bands of the ASTER image, while [55] obtained a high prediction accuracy of soil clay content using a mean spectral reflectance from bare soil pixels along a Landsat-TM time series.…”
Section: Clay Predictions Depending On the Multispectral Sensorsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The percentage of bare soil pixels over both fusion images (i.e., Fusion_SI and Fusion_SB) was equal to 34.6%, which corresponds to the common bare soil area between all derivedmultispectral images. Based on the spectral characteristics of multispectral satellite images (i.e., TM, OLI, AST, and S2A images) (Figure 4), the reflectance values rose as the clay content dropped [8]. The TM and OLI spectra appeared very similar (Figure 4a,b).…”
Section: Bare Soil Images and Spectral Pattern Descriptionsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The two most common satellite sensors used in soil mapping applications are National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Landsat archive and Sentinel-2 from the European Copernicus Space component (23% of the studies for Landsat and 33% for Sentinel). It is noteworthy, that recent high spatial resolution sensors (<3 m), such as Planet Imagery [52], are very important contributors to SOC estimation, while their contribution is low for clay estimation [53]. Žížala et al [54] also indicated that very high-resolution spatial sensors mounted on UAS (<1 m) present moderate accuracy of prediction for organic carbon estimation.…”
Section: The Spectral Dimensionmentioning
confidence: 99%