2016
DOI: 10.1111/synt.12126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clause Typing and Feature Inheritance of Discourse Features

Abstract: The aim of this article is twofold. First, we claim that δ‐features (discourse features), as well as ϕ‐features, can be inherited from C to T (Richards 2007, Chomsky 2008), as shown by wh‐agreement on T in Ojibwe (Algonquian). Our analysis supports Miyagawa's (2010) hypothesis that discourse and agreement features are two sides of the same coin, which can be distributed differently crosslinguistically. Second, we propose that although ϕ and δ typically bundle together on a single C head, this is not the case i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 47 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12 Placing it above both subject and object, e.g in Infl, doesn't seem like it would help either, as that just adds on another syntactic issue to solve, in addition to the problem of third person vs. part objects: why does this probe skip over the subject in preference for moving the object? 13 Passamaquoddy-Wolastoqey also has another LDA construction into conjunct complements that's found under verbs like 'know', in parallel with Odawa and Mi'gmaq, but in this LDA construction the matrix verb can agree with any argument of the embedded clause (Bruening 2001;LeSourd 2019), like in Blackfoot (Bliss 2009), Innu (Branigan & MacKenzie 2002), Kitigan Zibi Algonquin (Lochbihler & Mathieu 2016), and Meskwaki (Dahlstrom 2015).…”
Section: -Know Ta -2objmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 Placing it above both subject and object, e.g in Infl, doesn't seem like it would help either, as that just adds on another syntactic issue to solve, in addition to the problem of third person vs. part objects: why does this probe skip over the subject in preference for moving the object? 13 Passamaquoddy-Wolastoqey also has another LDA construction into conjunct complements that's found under verbs like 'know', in parallel with Odawa and Mi'gmaq, but in this LDA construction the matrix verb can agree with any argument of the embedded clause (Bruening 2001;LeSourd 2019), like in Blackfoot (Bliss 2009), Innu (Branigan & MacKenzie 2002), Kitigan Zibi Algonquin (Lochbihler & Mathieu 2016), and Meskwaki (Dahlstrom 2015).…”
Section: -Know Ta -2objmentioning
confidence: 99%