Clause chaining and the utterance phrase: Syntax–prosody mapping in Matukar Panau

Abstract

Clause chaining is a form of syntactic dependency holding between a series of clauses, typically expressing temporal or causal relations between events. Prosodic hierarchy theory proposes that syntactic constituents are systematically mapped to prosodic constituents, but most versions of the theory do not account for clause chain syntax. This article presents original data from Matukar Panau, a clause-chaining Oceanic (Austronesian) language of Papua New Guinea. The clause chain is a syntactic constituent in which final-clause TAM scopes over preceding clauses. There are also other types of multi-clausal structures, encompassing subordinate adverbial clauses, and verbless copula clauses, and we analyse all these as instances of the “syntactic sentence.” The syntactic sentence maps to a distinct prosodic domain, marked by the scaling of L% boundary tones, and we equate this domain with the “utterance phrase” posited in some versions of prosodic hierarchy theory. The prosodic characteristics of the Matukar Panau utterance phrase are similar to those found in non-chaining languages, but while other languages use this prosody to mark pragmatically related groups of clauses, in Matukar Panau it most commonly maps to a syntactic sentence.

Network Algorithms for Intelligent Evaluation of Composition in Middle School English Cloud Classrooms

“…The detection system studied not only has the characteristics of the traditional grammar detector mentioned above but also has a high response speed because of its unique statistical method, which shortens the running time. The following will provide a detailed introduction to the operation of LG and N-grammar models (Mansfield & Barth, 2021). LG is written in C language and has strong robustness.…”

Utterance chains: A dialogic route to speculative thinking-with toddlers in the Chthulucene

“…They can provide portals into otherwise impenetrable linguistic spaces where language is not shared or where interlocuters draw from competing or intersecting cultural and axiologic discourse (see, e.g. Berge and Raanes, 2013; Le Blanc, 2021; Mansfield and Barth, 2021; McBride and Bergen, 2014). A key feature of their analysis is that it pays attention to the lived event of language over time that takes place between interlocuters as discernible ‘.…”