“…(1) Particular resources (together with the support) have the potential to draw 'participants' (e.g. mathematics teachers; teacher educators; pupils) together as a working collective (see Sensevy et al 2013;Gueudet et al 2013a;Hoyles et al 2013;Visnovska and Cobb 2013;Kieran et al 2013); (2) The design and quality of resources are by no means a trivial matter: they need careful consideration, including in terms of newly developing perceptions and concepts of 'quality' of resources, in particular in the light of 'new' and 'different' IT resources (see Swan and Dorman 2013; Maschietto and Soury-Lavergne 2013); (3) Particular support is needed, either in terms of systemic support or individuals taking the lead, in order to develop well-functioning collectives (see Gueudet et al 2013a;Drijvers et al 2013;Trgalova and Jahn 2013).…”
Section: Teacher Learning With Resources and At Scalementioning
DOI to the publisher's website. • The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review. • The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers. Link to publication General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal. If the publication is distributed under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the "Taverne" license above, please follow below link for the End User Agreement:
“…(1) Particular resources (together with the support) have the potential to draw 'participants' (e.g. mathematics teachers; teacher educators; pupils) together as a working collective (see Sensevy et al 2013;Gueudet et al 2013a;Hoyles et al 2013;Visnovska and Cobb 2013;Kieran et al 2013); (2) The design and quality of resources are by no means a trivial matter: they need careful consideration, including in terms of newly developing perceptions and concepts of 'quality' of resources, in particular in the light of 'new' and 'different' IT resources (see Swan and Dorman 2013; Maschietto and Soury-Lavergne 2013); (3) Particular support is needed, either in terms of systemic support or individuals taking the lead, in order to develop well-functioning collectives (see Gueudet et al 2013a;Drijvers et al 2013;Trgalova and Jahn 2013).…”
Section: Teacher Learning With Resources and At Scalementioning
DOI to the publisher's website. • The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review. • The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers. Link to publication General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal. If the publication is distributed under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the "Taverne" license above, please follow below link for the End User Agreement:
“…School-based professional learning activities were instrumental in nurturing a flexible, professional learning environment that encouraged cooperation among teachers with varied levels of expertise in educational technology and facilitated the exchange of knowledge, experiences, and best practices. Echoing findings in the existing research literature [85][86][87][88][89], the study underscored the importance of teachers' engagement in professional learning activities, such as lesson design and field experience (e.g., classroom teaching/co-teaching, classroom observation, and action research), for enhancing their teaching skills with and deepening their understanding of TPACK in ways applicable to their own instructional practices. Aligned with prior scholarship [55,90,91], the study also affirmed the critical significance of school leadership in incentivizing teachers to proficiently apply their acquired TPACK competencies into their teaching practices.…”
This article is a self-narrative of our 18-year research into the technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)-guided professional development of teachers in ICT-enhanced mathematics learning. Using autoethnography as the methodology to elucidate our transformative personal evolution in implementing the TPACK model, we describe how we conceptualized and enacted the TPACK framework across three distinct phases of our research trajectory. In the first phase, our efforts focused on offering afternoon seminars and workshops on using educational software. Mathematics teachers attended the seminars and workshops voluntarily. In the second phase, we concentrated on designing programs guided by the principles of adult education, which emphasize the importance of learner autonomy and relevance, and socio-constructivist views of teacher professional growth, which stress the role of collaboration and reflection in learning. In the final phase, we adopted a systemic, school-based approach to investigating and expanding TPACK for mathematics and other STEM/STEAM teachers. At the end of each phase’s description, we delve into the profound lessons learned and how these led to a paradigm shift, expanding our perspective on TPACK as practitioners and researchers. Finally, we present a set of recommendations for future research and practice aimed at facilitating the sustainability of STEM/STEAM teacher professional learning initiatives.
“…Two important findings about how to design opportunities for video analysis emerge from this research. First, opportunities to engage in collective sense making are critical in shifting teachers’ perception of video (e.g., Borko et al, 2008; Sherin & van Es, 2009; Visnovska & Cobb, 2013). At the same time, novices must be guided to notice those features most salient to effective instruction (Borko et al, 2010; Roth et al, 2011; van Es et al, 2014), though combining expert- and teacher-led analyses might also be effective (Beisiegel et al, 2017).…”
Section: Teacher Facilitation Of Historical Discussionmentioning
History classrooms remain stubbornly resistant to instructional change. We explored whether using classroom video to help teachers identify curriculum-embedded opportunities for student discourse improved their understanding and facilitation of document-based historical discussions. We observed a relationship between teachers’ capacity to notice curriculum-embedded opportunities for student discourse in classroom videos and their growth in enacting document-based history discussions. For three of four teachers, the intervention appeared to improve both their analysis of document-based discussion facilitation and their enactment of the practice. Teachers’ incoming proficiency and familiarity with document-based history instruction appeared to inform their experience throughout the intervention. We discuss implications for practice and future research on professional development for history teachers.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.