Classroom Movement Breaks and Physically Active Learning Are Feasible, Reduce Sedentary Behaviour and Fatigue, and May Increase Focus in University Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract

Background: University students are mostly sedentary in tertiary education settings which may be detrimental to their health and learning. This review aimed to examine the feasibility and efficacy of classroom movement breaks (CMB) and physically active learning (PAL) on physical and cognitive outcomes in university students in the tertiary setting. Methods: Five electronic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, PsychINFO, and PubMed) were searched for articles published up until November 2021. Manual searching of reference lists and citation tracking were also completed. Two reviewers independently applied inclusion and exclusion criteria and completed quality assessment. Articles were included if they evaluated CMB or PAL interventions delivered to university students in a tertiary setting. Results: Of the 1691 articles identified, 14 studies with 5997 participants met the inclusion criteria. Average study quality scores were poor for both CMB and PAL studies. CMBs and PAL are feasible in the tertiary setting and increase physical activity, reduce sedentary behaviour, increase wellbeing, and reduce fatigue in university students. In addition, CMBs increased student focus and attention in class and PAL had no detrimental effect on academic performance. Conclusions: University educators should feel confident in introducing CMB and/or PAL interventions into their classes to improve student health and wellbeing.

Strengthening initial teacher education programs to deliver confident, effective, classroom-ready graduates: A feasibility study

“…While this study did not directly investigate the effects on pre-service teachers' classroom engagement, the consistency of these findings with previous experimental research underscores the significance of incorporating classroom activity breaks and physically active learning in all educational settings [22,58]. Lynch and colleagues' recent systematic review further supports the feasibility and efficacy of such interventions in university settings [59]. Future studies exploring the direct effects of TransformEd on pre-service teachers' classroom engagement, in addition to health and wellbeing outcomes, could provide additional evidence for the program's broader educational impact.…”

Effects of brain breaks on EFL students’ writing skills at the tertiary level

“…Brain breaks have been mostly applied in primary and secondary education levels, while there have been fewer cases reported and studied in the tertiary setting (Felez-Nobrega et al, 2018;Keating et al, 2022;Lynch, O'Donoghue, & Peiris, 2022;Paulus et al, 2021). The use of brain…”

“…Recent studies have investigated teachers' attitudes towards brain break applications as an educational strategy in the classroom. Although, the common scenario has been elementary schools, interventions among university students in a tertiary setting is limited (Felez-Nobrega et al, 2018;Keating et al, 2022;Lynch et al, 2022;Paulus et al, 2021). Studies have found that teachers and principals showed a positive attitude towards brain breaks (Donnelly, 2011;Infantes-Paniagua et al, 2021;James & McClure, 2020;Morgan & Hansen, 2008;Popeska et al, 2018;Van den Berg et al, 2017).…”

Study on the effect of workstation on college students' health and feasibility analysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

“…Moreover, some scholars have put forward specific measures to promote college students ' daily exercise, and carried out feasibility analysis or practical exploration. For example, Lynch believes that classroom rest and sports learning can effectively reduce students ' sedentary and fatigue, and analyzes the feasibility of this measure by reviewing relevant research results [8]. Through a set of experimental studies, Castro et alanalyzed the feasibility of one-to-one education and SMS reminders to reduce the sedentary behavior of college students [9].…”