2016
DOI: 10.1080/02635143.2015.1092955
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classroom learning and achievement: how the complexity of classroom interaction impacts students’ learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Operators are signal words that can be encountered in any given problem and which reflect the affordances and activities that are attached to the task at hand. These three operators were derived by re-analysing tasks from previous studies on the MHC-C with regard to the frequency of all different operators on each level of complexity (Bernholt & Parchmann, 2011;Podschuweit, Bernholt, & Brückmann, 2016). Accordingly, the operators 'name' (level 2), 'describe' (level 3), and 'explain' (levels 4 & 5) were seen to represent the affordances of each specific level of complexity.…”
Section: Scaffoldingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Operators are signal words that can be encountered in any given problem and which reflect the affordances and activities that are attached to the task at hand. These three operators were derived by re-analysing tasks from previous studies on the MHC-C with regard to the frequency of all different operators on each level of complexity (Bernholt & Parchmann, 2011;Podschuweit, Bernholt, & Brückmann, 2016). Accordingly, the operators 'name' (level 2), 'describe' (level 3), and 'explain' (levels 4 & 5) were seen to represent the affordances of each specific level of complexity.…”
Section: Scaffoldingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interaction in exchanging ideas between students can provide students with a more comprehensive understanding of the subject matter. This was also explained by Podschuweit et al (2016) stated that the complexity of communication in the classroom is related to student learning outcomes. This finding is consistent with the report of Suartika et al (2013); Puspani (2013);and Yulianingsih et al (2017) which states that cooperative learning improves students' cognitive learning outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Since the introduction of national educational standards and competence modelling, numerous German research groups have been dealing with the issue of knowledge-linking in the course of learning processes (e.g. Neumann et al, 2008;Wadouh et al, 2009;Lau, 2011;Knobloch et al, 2013;Wadouh et al, 2014;Podschuweit et al, 2016;Kubsch et al, 2019;Podschuweit & Bernholt, 2020). From the perspective of educational psychology, learning equals the acquisition of knowledge in which "[knowledge structures] are constructed and modified" (Steiner, 2006, p. 164, translated by the authors).…”
Section: Hierarchical and Non-hierarchical Linking Of Terms In Human ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model differentiates between the five linkage levels everyday experiences, facts, processes, linear causality, and multivariate interdependencies (Bernholt & Parchmann, 2011). This model is also used for the analysis of videotaped lessons (Podschuweit et al, 2016;Nehring et al, 2017) and serves as a basis in different competence models (Woitkowski et al, 2011;Arx & Bernholt, 2015;Woitkowski & Riese, 2017;Woitkowski, 2020).…”
Section: Models For the Description Of Vertical Linkagementioning
confidence: 99%