2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classroom discussion practices in online remote secondary school settings during COVID-19

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(58 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current research examined the perception of junior high school honorary teacher s about teaching English online and the obstacles faced in Pandemic Covid-19. Seven subindicators were questioned about the online teaching process in the pandemic era; they were online teaching process, lesson planning, online teaching application used, teaching facilities, teaching media, teaching method, and teaching materials [3,4].While related to the obstacle, the honorary teachers were asked about three sub-indicators: internet access, signal condition, and students' understanding. That information was gathered using interviews with four honorary teacher s named: honorary teacher 1, honorary teacher 2, honorary teacher 3, and honorary teacher 4.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current research examined the perception of junior high school honorary teacher s about teaching English online and the obstacles faced in Pandemic Covid-19. Seven subindicators were questioned about the online teaching process in the pandemic era; they were online teaching process, lesson planning, online teaching application used, teaching facilities, teaching media, teaching method, and teaching materials [3,4].While related to the obstacle, the honorary teachers were asked about three sub-indicators: internet access, signal condition, and students' understanding. That information was gathered using interviews with four honorary teacher s named: honorary teacher 1, honorary teacher 2, honorary teacher 3, and honorary teacher 4.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies in this area have focused on best practices for presenting content on a learning management system (e.g., Dumford & Miller, 2018; Keengwe & Kidd, 2010; Sclater, 2008), and more recently, research has spotlighted the effects of recorded lecture delivery on student engagement and learning (e.g., Chen & Wu, 2015; De Rosa, 2021; Guo et al, 2014; Robertson & Flowers, 2020). Examinations of the different types of online multimedia learning and e-learning have identified key principles for maximizing user engagement (Chiu, 2022; Guo et al, 2014; Gutentag et al, 2022; Kokoç et al, 2020; Pi et al, 2017). A large-scale examination of MOOCs found, for example, that video length and inclusion of a visual of the lecturer both influence watcher engagement; specifically, the study found the median MOOC video lecture engagement time to be 6 min regardless of video lecture length (Guo et al, 2014).…”
Section: Research On Remote and Hybrid Lecture Deliverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, cognitive empathy facilitates teachers' connection with students' experiences of constructing, communicating and critiquing knowledge (Barzilai & Chinn, 2018). Teachers with higher levels of cognitive empathy are more likely to give students time for reflection, thereby nurturing their cognitive styles and helping them identify challenges during online instruction (Fuller, 2012; Gutentag et al., 2022; Holmberg, 1999; Jaber, 2021). Additionally, teachers with elevated cognitive empathy tend to summarize students' cognitive styles (Duffin & Simpson, 2005) and promote content understanding through online discussion forums and video feedback (Morel, 2021; Thomas et al., 2017).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%