1995
DOI: 10.1080/01638539109544906
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classroom discourse and opportunities to learn: An ethnographic study of knowledge construction in a bilingual third‐grade classroom

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0
6

Year Published

1998
1998
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(29 reference statements)
1
39
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings may offer one possible reason that reading and vocabulary skills are observed to be highly stable, especially after kindergarten (Hart & Risley, 1995;Lonigan, Burgess, & Anthony, 2000). Children with stronger language and emergent literacy skills may have more opportunities to learn during both code-and meaningfocused activities (Tuyay, Jennings, & Dixon, 1995), which may contribute to the Matthew effect (Stanovich, 1986). The practical implication is that children with weaker skills need more, not Note.…”
Section: Meaning Focused Versus Code Focused and Explicit Versus Implmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings may offer one possible reason that reading and vocabulary skills are observed to be highly stable, especially after kindergarten (Hart & Risley, 1995;Lonigan, Burgess, & Anthony, 2000). Children with stronger language and emergent literacy skills may have more opportunities to learn during both code-and meaningfocused activities (Tuyay, Jennings, & Dixon, 1995), which may contribute to the Matthew effect (Stanovich, 1986). The practical implication is that children with weaker skills need more, not Note.…”
Section: Meaning Focused Versus Code Focused and Explicit Versus Implmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Working in various collaborative relationships over the last 8 years, our members found that they needed to develop and hold stable a common conceptual understanding and definitions of key concepts to conduct their collaborative investigations across classrooms and levels of schooling (grades 1-12). Without this common language and conceptually consistent approach to the study of literate practices in and across classrooms, the comparative analyses across ethnographic studies undertaken since 1991 would not have been possible (e.g., Green & Dixon, 1993;Tuyay, Jennings, & Dixon, 1995). Further, we found that as new members joined us, they brought with them meanings for terms used in our research community that often differed from ours, leading to problems in communication, and at times, relationships.…”
Section: Framing the Questionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…I puzzled over which angle ofvision I wanted to take in this particular article -teacher as researcher, researcher as teacher? Research is central and fundamental to the act of teaching... to studying student learning in the context of teaching, and to understanding the consequences for students of being in classrooms with particular kinds of opportunities for learning (Tuyay, Jennings & Dixon, 1995). How could I both show and tell what that means to me and make visible its implications for other teacher researchers in a short reflective essay?…”
Section: University Of California Santa Barbaramentioning
confidence: 99%