2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.05.066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classifying regenerating forest stages in Amazônia using remotely sensed images and a neural network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
25
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to make use of the available reflectance and backscatter spectra of optical and SAR, class distributions should be derived from multivariate time series. Using all available Landsat bands and other metrics (e.g., Landsat Band 5 or band 7, normalized burn ratio, tasseled cap wetness, texture), for example, showed improved F and NF class distinction [21,44,80,81].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to make use of the available reflectance and backscatter spectra of optical and SAR, class distributions should be derived from multivariate time series. Using all available Landsat bands and other metrics (e.g., Landsat Band 5 or band 7, normalized burn ratio, tasseled cap wetness, texture), for example, showed improved F and NF class distinction [21,44,80,81].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forest age has been modeled from Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) backscatter texture [9], but in many cases researchers can only resolve recently disturbed and old growth stands [10,11] and confidence intervals increase with stand age [12]. Backscatter temporal variation has also been used to model stand age [13,14], but this approach requires multiple acquisitions.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A relatively low correspondence between regenerative age (class) and spectral information has usually been reported (Sader et al 1989, Lucas et al 2000, Lu 2005 and references therein, Kuplich 2006). Recently, hyperspectral images (Thenkabail et al 2004), Landsat ETM+ images (Vieira et al 2003) and radar images combined with optical images (Kuplich 2006) have provided promising results in discriminating between secondary forest classes. Vieira (2003) and Kuplich (2006) also linked information on dominant tree species to the forest classes distinguished in the remotely sensed data.…”
Section: Vegetation Classesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, hyperspectral images (Thenkabail et al 2004), Landsat ETM+ images (Vieira et al 2003) and radar images combined with optical images (Kuplich 2006) have provided promising results in discriminating between secondary forest classes. Vieira (2003) and Kuplich (2006) also linked information on dominant tree species to the forest classes distinguished in the remotely sensed data. Some forest types traditionally recognised by indigenous peoples have also been classified from satellite images (Shepard et al 2004, HernandezStefanoni et al 2006).…”
Section: Vegetation Classesmentioning
confidence: 99%