2018
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.97.042307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classifying quantum entanglement through topological links

Abstract: We propose a new classification scheme for quantum entanglement based on topological links. This is done by identifying a non-rigid ring to a particle, attributing the act of cutting and removing a ring to the operation of tracing out the particle, and associating linked rings to entangled particles. This analogy naturally leads us to a classification of multipartite quantum entanglement based on all possible distinct links for a given number of rings. To determine all different possibilities, we develop a for… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To prove this statement we use the technique of associating rings to polynomials provided in [30]. Consider a polynomial of N variables, P m (x 1 , x 2 , .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…To prove this statement we use the technique of associating rings to polynomials provided in [30]. Consider a polynomial of N variables, P m (x 1 , x 2 , .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These rules for polynomial construction can then be used to count the number of distinct ways to link a given number of rings. For N = 2, 3, 4 and 5 rings, there are respectively 1, 4, 40 and 6900 ways to form a link [30], while for an arbitrary N the corresponding number has not been found yet. A particularly interesting subclass of links with N rings is one where all rings remain connected after any m < N cuts, but become fully separated if m + 1 cuts are performed.…”
Section: ) Relabeling Of Variables Is Irrelevant;mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…of distorted black holes [19,20], in the spacetimes of dimension higher (or smaller) than 4 [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%