Classifying Perspectives: Expressing Levels of Knowing in the Integrative Levels Classification

Kleineberg, Michael

doi:10.5771/9783956507762-489

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Apparently in a seemingly position of compromise, Gnoli (2018) includes concepts, as produced through the evolving interaction of percepts (individual experience of reality) and previously accumulated knowledge, in the notion of phenomena, that are taken as the basic units of the Integrative Levels Classification (ILC). The combinable facets of ILC include several "elements of perspective" seeking to integrate epistemological aspects into an ontological KOS as noted by Kleineberg (2020). This feature aims to overcome the limits of the disciplinary compartmentalization of KOSs such as the Dewey Decimal Classification or the Universal Decimal Classification which, in addition, present some misfit to the digital context as stated by Szostak et al (2016); Dahlberg (2017); Simões et al (2016); Gnoli (2008).…”

Section: The Aim and Scope Of The Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

Can an Ontologically-Oriented KO Do Without Concepts?

Machado¹,

Simões²,

Gnoli³

et al. 2020

Knowledge Organization at the Interface

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The ontological approach in the development of KOS is an attempt to overcome the limitations of the traditional epistemological approach. Questions raise about the representation and organization of ontologically-oriented KO units, such as BFO universals or ILC phenomena. The study aims to compare the ontological approaches of BFO and ILC using a hermeneutic approach. We found that the differences between the units of the two systems are primarily due to the formal level of abstraction of BFO and the different organizations, namely the grouping of phenomena into ILC classes that represent complex compounds of entities in the BFO approach. In both systems the use of concepts is considered instrumental, although in the ILC they constitute the intersubjective component of the phenomena whereas in BFO they serve to access the entities of reality but are not part of them.1 During the 8th conference of the ISKO Spanish chapter (2017), as part of the proposals labeled as "the León manifesto." http://www.iskoi.org/ilc/leon.php (access on 8.1.2020).

show abstract