2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10623-018-0544-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classifying optimal binary subspace codes of length 8, constant dimension 4 and minimum distance 6

Abstract: We determine the maximum size A 2 (8, 6; 4) of a binary subspace code of packet length v = 8, minimum subspace distance d = 6, and constant dimension k = 4 to be 257. There are two isomorphism types of optimal codes. Both of them are extended LMRD codes. In finite geometry terms, the maximum number of solids in PG(7, 2) mutually intersecting in at most a point is 257. The result was obtained by combining the classification of substructures with integer linear programming techniques. This result implies that th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
64
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless parametric improved upper bounds for A q (v, v − 4) and A q (8, 3) have been obtained. We illustrate our results with a small (13,9) 34058 34591 34306 34056 Lemma 4 32514 Here "improved cdc" refers to Lemma 1, "ILP E/V" to the ILP of Etzion and Vardy, see Section 2, "SDP" to results based on semidefinite programming, see [2], "johnson" to the results obtained in this paper, and "bklb" to the currently best known lower bound, see [12]. If the entry of "ILP E/V" is written in italics, then the value for subspace distance d − 1 is taken.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless parametric improved upper bounds for A q (v, v − 4) and A q (8, 3) have been obtained. We illustrate our results with a small (13,9) 34058 34591 34306 34056 Lemma 4 32514 Here "improved cdc" refers to Lemma 1, "ILP E/V" to the ILP of Etzion and Vardy, see Section 2, "SDP" to results based on semidefinite programming, see [2], "johnson" to the results obtained in this paper, and "bklb" to the currently best known lower bound, see [12]. If the entry of "ILP E/V" is written in italics, then the value for subspace distance d − 1 is taken.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We continue with subspace distance d = 6. [24, Theorem 3.3(i)] implies A 2 (8, 6) = A 2 (8, 6; 4), where the latter was determined to A 2 (8, 6; 4) = 257 in [18]. For the constant-dimension case all two isomorphism types were classified in [18,Theorem 1].…”
Section: Subspace Codes In F 8mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[24, Theorem 3.3(i)] implies A 2 (8, 6) = A 2 (8, 6; 4), where the latter was determined to A 2 (8, 6; 4) = 257 in [18]. For the constant-dimension case all two isomorphism types were classified in [18,Theorem 1]. An essential building block is the lifted Gabidulin code G 8,4,3 , which corresponds to the unique 4 × 4 MRD code with rank distance 3 over F 2 , see [18,Theorem 10].…”
Section: Subspace Codes In F 8mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations