2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-24322-7_39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classifying Difficulty Levels of Programming Questions on HackerRank

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [8], [9], [10] authors propose online exam environments that can prevent cheating actions with preemptive procedures, so that without any proctor they can minimize the number of cheating attempts. In another variation of this approach, preemptive systems are combined with human proctors as in [11], [12] There are automated interview systems that do not have AI-based anti-cheating services like [13], [14]. These systems were designed for an online coding platform to evaluate the candidates.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [8], [9], [10] authors propose online exam environments that can prevent cheating actions with preemptive procedures, so that without any proctor they can minimize the number of cheating attempts. In another variation of this approach, preemptive systems are combined with human proctors as in [11], [12] There are automated interview systems that do not have AI-based anti-cheating services like [13], [14]. These systems were designed for an online coding platform to evaluate the candidates.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These systems were designed for an online coding platform to evaluate the candidates. Although [13] and [14] have plagiarism services, there is no detection for the presence of multiple persons or electronic device usage. Some approaches like [15] combine autonomous detection systems with human proctors with well-defined pipelines.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The efficiency of writing programs in a written test can be only attained with hands‐on practice. It is found that the motivation levels and learning in programming courses get better with the usage of online coding tools [27]. Even the time constraints posed in the online coding tools have been found to have an impact on the students' learning skills [14].…”
Section: Literature Review and Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They provide the freedom of giving customized test cases also. Practicing coding through these forums is generally considered to have an impact on the student learning in programming and algorithmic courses [14,27]. Many educational institutions promote the usage of these platforms among their students.…”
Section: Literature Review and Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%