2019
DOI: 10.3390/genes10030200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classifying Breast Cancer Subtypes Using Multiple Kernel Learning Based on Omics Data

Abstract: It is very significant to explore the intrinsic differences in breast cancer subtypes. These intrinsic differences are closely related to clinical diagnosis and designation of treatment plans. With the accumulation of biological and medicine datasets, there are many different omics data that can be viewed in different aspects. Combining these multiple omics data can improve the accuracy of prediction. Meanwhile; there are also many different databases available for us to download different types of omics data.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the study of breast cancer subtypes is of great significance for precision medicine and prognosis prediction of breast cancer [5]. By understanding the molecular subtypes of breast cancer, doctors can better decide which treatment is suitable for each patient, thus saving money for the whole medical system and avoiding the side effects of unnecessary treatment [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the study of breast cancer subtypes is of great significance for precision medicine and prognosis prediction of breast cancer [5]. By understanding the molecular subtypes of breast cancer, doctors can better decide which treatment is suitable for each patient, thus saving money for the whole medical system and avoiding the side effects of unnecessary treatment [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current research on breast cancer subtypes focuses mainly on the molecular typing. In 1999, molecular typing of cancer was first proposed by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) [6]. In 2000, Perou et al first proposed the molecular typing of breast cancer and concluded that breast cancer is divided into four subtypes, namely luminal subtype, basal-like subtype, human epidermal growth subtype and normal breast-like subtype [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then AutoOmics linked all the three models and again generated an optimal model for data integration as an ENAS-based three-FC-layer network with 512, 64 and 16 neurons (Figure 5A), with an improved top-1 accuracy as 0.907 (Luminal A: 0.939, Luminal B: 0.778, HER2-enriched: 0.889, Basal-like: 1), significantly better than each of the single-omics model (Figure 5B and 5C). It outperformed a published approach using SMO-MKL, which achieved a 0.798 average accuracy of any two immunohistochemistry-marker-based subtypes 28 . When direct concatenating three omics data together, the top-1 accuracy is 0.773, better than that of gene mutation and worse than gene expression and protein expression (Figure 5B).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, SVM is not suitable for analyzing multiple data sources using a single kernel function. We can use Multiple Kernel Learning (MKL) method to combine kernels calculated on different input data modality to obtain better predictive performance [29,30].…”
Section: Subtype Prediction Of New Asd Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%