2019
DOI: 10.3844/jcssp.2019.1291.1306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classifying and Predicting Students’ Performance using Improved Decision Tree C4.5 in Higher Education Institutes

Abstract: Students' information in higher education institutions increases yearly. It is hard for them to extract meaningful information from the huge amount of data manually. Such information can support academic staff to stop students from dropping out at the end of courses. This can be done by evaluating the students' performance for the course and also by predicting their performance in the final exam early by using classification algorithms. Four classification algorithms, which are Decision Tree C4.5, Random Fores… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the BT model also has the advantage of predicting class imbalance data. This result was quite different from the study conducted by Sadiq and Ahmed [14] that concluded Decision Tree model shows better results in predicting student performance in the final exam. Meanwhile, Cinaroglu [15] stated that Random Forest provides better AUC score than the Decision Tree in predicting health expenditures.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the BT model also has the advantage of predicting class imbalance data. This result was quite different from the study conducted by Sadiq and Ahmed [14] that concluded Decision Tree model shows better results in predicting student performance in the final exam. Meanwhile, Cinaroglu [15] stated that Random Forest provides better AUC score than the Decision Tree in predicting health expenditures.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The results showed that Random Forest accurately predicted successful students at the end of the class with an accuracy of 88.3% with an equal width and information gain ratio. Mohammed & Nawzat (2019) carried out a research in which they classified and predicted students' performance using classification algorithms in the final exam. Four classification algorithms, which are Decision Tree C4.5, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Naive Bayes, were used in this research in order to classify and predict the students' performance.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, in a study conducted by Sadiq et al [10], four algorithms which were Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, Decision Tree C4.5, and Naïve Bayes were used to classify and predict students' performance. The data for the study was mined through interviews with the academic staff of three universities in Duhok province, Kurdistan, Iraq.…”
Section: Comparative Studymentioning
confidence: 99%