2009 International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Informatics 2009
DOI: 10.1109/iceei.2009.5254797
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classifiers combination to arabic morphosyntactic disambiguation

Abstract: Parts of speech tagging forms the important preprocessing step in many of the natural language processing applications like text summarization, question answering and information retrieval system. MorphoSyntactic disambiguation (part of speech tagging) is the process of classifying every word in a given context to its appropriate part of speech. In this paper, we first review all the supervised machine learning approaches that have been used in the part of speech tagging. Then we review all the Arabic works to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Combining more than one classifier is also another approach adapted by Albared et al (2009), who combined maximum entropy, hidden Markov, and transformation-based as probabilistic classifiers. The authors performed preprocessing steps before employing a selection algorithm to test morphosyntactic disambiguation, including voting, tagging, and cascading.…”
Section: Supervised Machine Learning Arabic Wsd Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combining more than one classifier is also another approach adapted by Albared et al (2009), who combined maximum entropy, hidden Markov, and transformation-based as probabilistic classifiers. The authors performed preprocessing steps before employing a selection algorithm to test morphosyntactic disambiguation, including voting, tagging, and cascading.…”
Section: Supervised Machine Learning Arabic Wsd Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e scoring is generally done by extraction of grammatical and semantic relations from the student response and reference response [1]. e vector space model can be incorporated to correlate words as well as textual contexts from the student response with reference responses [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%