Classifier Performance Evaluation in Wrist and Finger Movement Fitting Task Based on Forearm HD-sEMG

Abstract

Background: The transmission of human body movements to other devices through wearable smart bracelets have attracted more and more attentions in the field of human-machine interface (HMI) applications. However, due to the limitation of the collection range of wearable bracelets, it is necessary to study the relationship between the superposition of wrist and finger motion and their cooperative motion to simplify the collection system of the device.Methods: The multi-channel high-density surface electromyogram (HD-sEMG) signal has high spatial resolution and can improve the accuracy of multi-channel fitting. In this study, we quantified the HD-sEMG forearm spatial activation features of 256 channels of hand movement, and performed a linear fitting of the quantified features of fingers and wrist movements to verify the linear superposition relationship between fingers and wrist cooperative movements and their independent movements. The most important thing is to classify and predict the results of the fitting and the actual measured fingers and wrist cooperative actions by four commonly used classifiers: Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) ,K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) ,Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Random Forest (RF), and evaluate the performance of the four classifiers in gesture fitting in detail according to the classification results.Results: In a total of 12 kinds of synthetic gesture actions, in the three cases where the number of fitting channels was selected as 8, 32 and 64, four classifiers of LDA, SVM, RF and KNN are used for classification prediction. When the number of fitting channels was 8, the prediction accuracy of LDA classifier was 99.70%, the classification accuracy of KNN was 99.40%, the classification accuracy of SVM was 99.20%, and the classification accuracy of RF was 93.75%. When the number of fitting channels was 32, the accuracy of LDA was 98.51%, the classification accuracy of KNN was 97.92%, the accuracy of SVM is 96.73%, and the accuracy of RF was 86.61%. When the number of fitting channels is 64, the accuracy of LDA is 95.83%, the classification accuracy of KNN is 91.67%, the accuracy of SVM is 86.90%, and the accuracy of RF is 83.30%.Conclusion: It can be seen from the results that when the number of fitting channels is 8, the classification accuracy of the three classifiers of LDA, KNN and SVM is basically the same, but the time-consuming of SVM is very small. When the amount of data is large, the priority should be selected SVM as the classifier. When the number of fitting channels increases, the classification accuracy of the LDA classifier will be higher than the other three classifiers, so the LDA classifier should be more appropriate. The classification accuracy of the RF classifier in this type of problem has always been far lower than the other three classifiers, so it is not recommended to use the RF classifier as a classifier for gesture stacking related work.

The Evaluation of Classifier Performance during Fitting Wrist and Finger Movement Task Based on Forearm HD-sEMG

“…Finally, the results of this study can provide reliable guidance for future studies on the correlation between the finger and wrist and promote the further simplification of human forelimb bionics equipment. [31].…”