2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2012.10021
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification Under Uncertainty: Data Analysis for Diagnostic Antibody Testing

Paul N. Patrone,
Anthony J. Kearsley

Abstract: Formulating accurate and robust classification strategies is a key challenge of developing diagnostic and antibody tests. Methods that do not explicitly account for disease prevalence and uncertainty therein can lead to significant classification errors. We present a novel method that leverages optimal decision theory to address this problem. As a preliminary step, we develop an analysis that uses an assumed prevalence and conditional probability models of diagnostic measurement outcomes to define optimal (in … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that inherent to any test, the threshold (such as Ct mentioned above) may be tunable. Therefore, besides intrinsic physical limitations, binary classification of "continuous-valued" readouts (e.g., viral load) may also lead to an overall error of either type [4]. In this work, we will assume that there is a standardized threshold and the test readout is binary; if any virus is detected, the test subject is positive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that inherent to any test, the threshold (such as Ct mentioned above) may be tunable. Therefore, besides intrinsic physical limitations, binary classification of "continuous-valued" readouts (e.g., viral load) may also lead to an overall error of either type [4]. In this work, we will assume that there is a standardized threshold and the test readout is binary; if any virus is detected, the test subject is positive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%