2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-16-5689-7_38
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification System for Prediction of Chronic Kidney Disease Using Data Mining Techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It uses the p-value and z-value to evaluate the performance of each individual. The calculation of z is performed using Equation (37), and then the corresponding p-value is obtained from the normal distribution table.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It uses the p-value and z-value to evaluate the performance of each individual. The calculation of z is performed using Equation (37), and then the corresponding p-value is obtained from the normal distribution table.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of z in this context refers to the z-score value, which is calculated using a formula represented by Equation (37). In the formula, N and M represent the quantity of models and datasets used in the experiment, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Te authors in [27] applied L1norm-based and chi-square-based FS strategies to classify breast cancer. In other CKD studies [28][29][30], principal component analysis (PCA) is utilized to extract noteworthy features from the dataset. Te authors [28] extracted 19 features using PCA and achieved the highest accuracy of 98% using the support vector machine (SVM) classifer.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other algorithms like Naive Bayes, Support Vector Machine, KNN, DT, and Multilayer Perceptron showed accuracy variations from 71.56% to 96.22%. (Saha, Gourisaria, & Harshvardhan, 2022) Showed that almost all tested models had accuracies below 99.08%, with Random Forest reaching exactly 99.08%. (Purwaningsih, 2022) focused on SVM with Feature Selection (FS), finding that the combination of SVM (radial)+FS yielded the best results with an accuracy of 99.75%, followed by SVM (dot)+FS (99.50%) and SVM (polynomial)+FS (95.50%).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%