2013
DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203511
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of vasculitis: EMA classification using CHCC 2012 definitions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
5

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
33
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…All patients were classified using the European Medicines Agency algorithm . The performance of this well‐validated tool for the classification of systemic vasculitis is similar when used with either the 1994 or the 2012 Chapel Hill Consensus Conference definitions . Two physicians experienced in the treatment of systemic vasculitis (JHS and JUH) classified the patients independently (patients were excluded in cases of disagreement if the researchers did not reach agreement when discussing these cases).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All patients were classified using the European Medicines Agency algorithm . The performance of this well‐validated tool for the classification of systemic vasculitis is similar when used with either the 1994 or the 2012 Chapel Hill Consensus Conference definitions . Two physicians experienced in the treatment of systemic vasculitis (JHS and JUH) classified the patients independently (patients were excluded in cases of disagreement if the researchers did not reach agreement when discussing these cases).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exclusion criteria were AAV induced by cocaine or other drugs, and/or anti–glomerular basement membrane (anti‐GBM) positivity . Patients were classified using the European Medicines Agency classification as having GPA, MPA, or eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Churg‐Strauss) (EGPA) . GPA was considered to be localized when the disease was restricted to the upper and/or lower respiratory tract, as previously defined by the European League Against Rheumatism/European Vasculitis Study Group guidelines .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barring a single patient who had to be excluded from the analysis, all MPA patients were also reclassified in the same diagnostic category. The new classification algorithm has been shown to have good correlation when either the original (1994) or the revised (2012) Chapel Hill definitions were used in the algorithm . Similar results were found in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%