2018 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Data Processing (IDAP) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/idap.2018.8620877
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of Turkish Vowels Based on Formant Frequencies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…/a/ presents a rapprochement of F1 and F2, F1 has a maximum value around 1000 Hz. Korkmaz and Aytug [10] exploited the formant frequency values (F1, F2 and F3) of eight Turkish vowels within CVC syllables to identify the most efficient classification method. They deduced that support vector machines (SVM) distinguishes Turkish vowels from formant frequencies with a classification success of 90%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…/a/ presents a rapprochement of F1 and F2, F1 has a maximum value around 1000 Hz. Korkmaz and Aytug [10] exploited the formant frequency values (F1, F2 and F3) of eight Turkish vowels within CVC syllables to identify the most efficient classification method. They deduced that support vector machines (SVM) distinguishes Turkish vowels from formant frequencies with a classification success of 90%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In articulatory phonetics, /a/ being the least anterior and most open front vowel, has a rear cavity affiliated with a very high F1, exhibiting intermediate lowering and advancement of the tongue. Because the first two formants F1 and F2 are concentrated in the low frequencies (F1>100 Hz and F2 1,000 Hz), the energy of the vowel /u/, which is the most closed, posterior, and rounded, is concentrated in the first band B1 [32], [33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, non-native speakers may be more sensitive to the phonological characteristics of syllables in grammatical and ungrammatical conditions. This may reflect the difference in formant frequencies in Farsi and Turkish vowels ( Modaresi Ghavami, 2011 ; Korkmaz and Boyaci, 2018 ) where frequencies of F1 and F2 for the Farsi vowels /a/ and /i/ are higher than in their Turkish counterparts. Since we are not aware of similar reports, this finding should be followed up in future studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%