Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.09.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of team sport activities using a single wearable tracking device

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
73
1
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
73
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Global Positioning System (GPS) technology has been used extensively to quantify the average running demands of rugby union. [1][2][3] Despite the volume of research using GPS technology in rugby union, no studies have reported simultaneously on GPS metrics and performance. In rugby league, it has been reported that condensed periods of repeated highintensity efforts (RHIE) are common prior to scoring or conceding a try.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Global Positioning System (GPS) technology has been used extensively to quantify the average running demands of rugby union. [1][2][3] Despite the volume of research using GPS technology in rugby union, no studies have reported simultaneously on GPS metrics and performance. In rugby league, it has been reported that condensed periods of repeated highintensity efforts (RHIE) are common prior to scoring or conceding a try.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim is to develop an algorithm based on sample data that can be used to classify subjects or predict outcomes in other datasets. Some examples in health‐related research include the use of NNs or SVMs to classify activity patterns, to detect obesity, to predict those who will reduce salt intake and to predict if dietary patterns can predict acute coronary syndrome . In the analysis we have reported here, the error rate was high and the error under the curve lower than the CART model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…As shown in Figure 1A, these algorithms showed different performance and some of them displayed high AUCs. For example, Simple Logistic and LMT algorithm [30] covered the maximum area under the curve (AUC=0.975, standard deviation (SD), 0.04), followed by Random Forest (AUC=0.94, SD, 0.05) and Bayesian methods (AUC=0.93, SD, 0.06), while lazy. IB1 model [31]only achieved an AUC of 0.693 (SD, 0.13).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%