Imaging, Manipulation, and Analysis of Biomolecules, Cells, and Tissues XIX 2021
DOI: 10.1117/12.2577004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of T cell metabolism from autofluorescence imaging features

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Machine learning models are appropriate for analysis of datasets with multiple variables, and have been used to extract and interpret cell phenotypes from fluorescence lifetime data. Several studies have applied extracted lifetime features with machine learning algorithms to identify mouse embryo health, quantify precancer cells, classify T cell activation, differentiate stem cell phenotypes, and investigate metabolic perturbations (35,54,(62)(63)(64)(65)(66). Here, both conventional machine learning methods and neural networks were trained with autofluorescence lifetime images and features to predict metabolic states of cancer cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning models are appropriate for analysis of datasets with multiple variables, and have been used to extract and interpret cell phenotypes from fluorescence lifetime data. Several studies have applied extracted lifetime features with machine learning algorithms to identify mouse embryo health, quantify precancer cells, classify T cell activation, differentiate stem cell phenotypes, and investigate metabolic perturbations (35,54,(62)(63)(64)(65)(66). Here, both conventional machine learning methods and neural networks were trained with autofluorescence lifetime images and features to predict metabolic states of cancer cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, subcellular features like mitochondrial clusters and networks in the autofluorescence images have been utilized to discriminate different metabolic activities in skin and tumor cells [9,12,17]. Moreover, spatial localization of fluorescence lifetime features including free NAD(P)H fraction (α 1 ), bound FAD fraction (α 1 ), and redox ratios (FAD/(FAD + NAD(P)H)) provides additional metabolic information in T cells [18]. However, the identification of subcellular features in autofluorescence images requires domain expertise and customized data and image processing algorithms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in metabolic pathways within MCF7 cells alter the fluorescence lifetimes of NAD(P)H and FAD. The reduction of free NAD(P)H fraction (α 1 ) with 2-DG treatment was observed in MCF10A breast cancer cells and pancreatic islet cells (Drozdowicz-Tomsia et al, 2014;Wang et al, 2021). Conversely, a higher level of glycolysis induced more fraction of free NAD(P)H in kidney cells, neural cells, and stem cells in disease states (Stringari et al, 2012a;Chakraborty et al, 2016;Sameni et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Machine learning models are appropriate for analysis of datasets with multiple variables, and have been used to extract and interpret cell phenotypes from fluorescence lifetime data. Several studies have applied extracted lifetime features with machine learning algorithms to identify mouse embryo health, quantify precancer cells, classify T cell activation, differentiate stem cell phenotypes, and investigate metabolic perturbations ( Gu et al, 2015 ; Liu et al, 2018 ; Ma et al, 2019 ; Wang et al, 2020 ; Hu et al, 2021 ; Qian et al, 2021 ; Walsh et al, 2021 ). Here, both conventional machine learning methods and neural networks were trained with autofluorescence lifetime images and features to predict metabolic states of cancer cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%