2009
DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2009.0156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of sparse high-dimensional vectors

Abstract: We study the problem of classification of d-dimensional vectors into two classes (one of which is 'pure noise') based on a training sample of size m. The main specific feature is that the dimension d can be very large. We suppose that the difference between the distribution of the population and that of the noise is only in a shift, which is a sparse vector. For Gaussian noise, fixed sample size m, and dimension d that tends to infinity, we obtain the sharp classification boundary, i.e. the necessary and suffi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(20 reference statements)
1
50
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, by a direct use of the elementary Random Matrix Theory [45], H 0 = ZZ − pI p ≤ C √ pn. Combining these with (C.25)-(C. 26) gives (C.27)…”
Section: Appendix B: Proof Of Lemmas In Sectionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…At the same time, by a direct use of the elementary Random Matrix Theory [45], H 0 = ZZ − pI p ≤ C √ pn. Combining these with (C.25)-(C. 26) gives (C.27)…”
Section: Appendix B: Proof Of Lemmas In Sectionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…for some absolute constant C * > 0, where the last inequality follows from (17). Choosing A ε as a solution of C * A −2 ε = ε we obtain (22). The case 0 < q < 2 is treated analogously by introducing the test…”
Section: Consequences For the Problem Of Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, note that ρ l ρ k = ρ l ρ k (1 − γ 2 p 1 ,N ). Repeating the proof of Theorem 1 but with ρ l and ρ k and under the stronger condition (33), obtain P (l = l |x = x) ≤ 2α that, together with (18) and P (x = x) ≤ 2α, completes the proof.…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 61%