2020
DOI: 10.17148/ijarcce.2020.9701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of Pima Indian Diabetes Dataset using Ensemble of Decision Tree, Logistic Regression and Neural Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be concluded that a Naïve Bayes model works well with a more fine-tuned selection of features for binary classification. Abedin et al [25] studied a hierarchical ensemble model to combine two classifiers that had been trained, a decision tree and a logistic regression model, and feed the output of those models to a neural network.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be concluded that a Naïve Bayes model works well with a more fine-tuned selection of features for binary classification. Abedin et al [25] studied a hierarchical ensemble model to combine two classifiers that had been trained, a decision tree and a logistic regression model, and feed the output of those models to a neural network.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the SVM model underperforms if the number of attributes for every data point exceeds the training samples. The combinational models for diabetes prediction using Cross-validation and Self-Organizing Maps (SOM) have achieved an accuracy of 78.4% [ 32 , 33 ]. SOM can rely on the associated weights of neurons for precise classification.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bihter [31] used the high performance neural network on ILPD that gave the training accuracy of 71.95% and validation accuracy as 73.28% Bihter [31]. Abedini, et al [32] put forward an ensemble model comprising artificial neural network (ANN), logistic regression (LR) and decision tree (DT) to classify the PIMA dataset. The accuracy obtained by the authors was calculated as 83.08% Abedini, et al [32].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abedini, et al [32] put forward an ensemble model comprising artificial neural network (ANN), logistic regression (LR) and decision tree (DT) to classify the PIMA dataset. The accuracy obtained by the authors was calculated as 83.08% Abedini, et al [32]. Razali, et al [33] proposed the use of neural network and bayesian model on ILPD and got the accuracy result of 66.85% and 70.52% respectively Razali, et al prediction value 74.10% Barik [34].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%