2019
DOI: 10.22266/ijies2019.0630.03
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of Ontological Violence Content Detection through Audio Features and Supervised Learning

Abstract: Violence detection is one of the important aspects, which can be used in different applications. Based on the data format, the violence can be defined in many ways. This paper focused to develop an automatic violence detection framework from audio type data. To do this, a new and efficient set of features are extracted from the audio signals, which provides more discrimination between different types of violence types in audio signals. Considering both spatial and Mel frequency characteristics of audio signals… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For pork, 79 out of 82 data were predicted correctly and for beef, 46 out of 50 data were predicted correctly, while the other 4 data were predicted incorrectly. Hence, we can obtain various indicators, such as accuracy, precision, and recall in order to indicate the performance of the classifier [31], as can be seen in Table 6. For additional analysis, the classification result of SVM is divided into true positive rate (TPR), false negative rate (FNR), true negative rate (TNR), and false positive rate (FPR), as summarized in Table 7.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For pork, 79 out of 82 data were predicted correctly and for beef, 46 out of 50 data were predicted correctly, while the other 4 data were predicted incorrectly. Hence, we can obtain various indicators, such as accuracy, precision, and recall in order to indicate the performance of the classifier [31], as can be seen in Table 6. For additional analysis, the classification result of SVM is divided into true positive rate (TPR), false negative rate (FNR), true negative rate (TNR), and false positive rate (FPR), as summarized in Table 7.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Работы, посвященные распознаванию агрессии по невербальному речевому поведению в аудиосигнале, можно разделить на те, которые рассматривают классические методы машинного обучения и методы, использующие глубокие нейронные сети. Классические методы машинного обучения отражены в работах [100], раскрывающих классификацию спектральных признаков посредством SVM. В работе [101] представлена классификация главных компонент спектра давления воздуха посредством HMM.…”
unclassified