Olfaction, Taste, and Cognition 2002
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511546389.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of Odors and Structure–Odor Relationships

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Odour identification is also usually influenced by social and cultural factors (Saito et al, 2006). For these reasons and also due to the lack of standard smell classification schemes (Chastrette, 2002;Kaye, 2001), it is advised that familiar smells be used for experiments involving the use of olfactory data (Kaye, 2001;Saito et al, 2006). We finally opted for six smells which distinguish between the odour classes, flowery, foul, fruity, burnt, resinous and spicy.…”
Section: The Smells or Olfactory Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Odour identification is also usually influenced by social and cultural factors (Saito et al, 2006). For these reasons and also due to the lack of standard smell classification schemes (Chastrette, 2002;Kaye, 2001), it is advised that familiar smells be used for experiments involving the use of olfactory data (Kaye, 2001;Saito et al, 2006). We finally opted for six smells which distinguish between the odour classes, flowery, foul, fruity, burnt, resinous and spicy.…”
Section: The Smells or Olfactory Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…losing one's sensitivity to detecting odours as a result of continuous exposure to odours and prolonged stimulation of the olfactory sense (Köster, 2002). Moreover, Chastrette (2002) points out that there are still no known standard classification schemes for smells and certainly none found acceptable to all, with the consequence that the available odour classification schemes are established with different aims and objectives in mind. Thus, the consequence is that each of these classification schemes in reality suits different purposes.…”
Section: The Smells or Olfactory Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research [13,21,39,40] has shown that while we are often able to detect the presence of the variety of smells we come in to contact with daily, we are often unable to associate a meaningful name to these smells and will normally identify them by saying, "this/that smell reminds me of some known object" or pointing to some object and saying, "this smells like that", that is by association [21,39,66]. may be traced.…”
Section: Identification and Classification Of Smellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basis for these classification schemes varies widely, each established with different aims and objectives in mind, and differing in terms of their theoretical foundations, and as a result, comparisons between the schemes should be made cautiously [13].…”
Section: Identification and Classification Of Smellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation