2013
DOI: 10.1111/nmo.12077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of normal and abnormal colonic motility based on cross‐correlations of pancolonic manometry data

Abstract: Automated analysis of colonic manometry data using cross-correlation separated all patients from controls. This automated technique indicates that the contractile motor patterns in STC patients differ from those recorded in healthy controls. The analytical technique may represent a means for defining subtypes of constipation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Simultaneous pressure waves were more or less ignored for a long time because pan-colonic pressure changes can be caused by general abdominal pressure increases and in some studies such events were deliberately filtered out ( Wiklendt et al, 2013 ). Indeed, abdominal pressure changes, due to coughing, straining or changing of body position, will give simultaneous pressure changes, but these activities are usually associated with external sphincter contraction, not with anal sphincter relaxation ( Chen et al, 2017 ) and they are associated with abdominal muscular action potentials whereas SPWs are not ( Corsetti et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simultaneous pressure waves were more or less ignored for a long time because pan-colonic pressure changes can be caused by general abdominal pressure increases and in some studies such events were deliberately filtered out ( Wiklendt et al, 2013 ). Indeed, abdominal pressure changes, due to coughing, straining or changing of body position, will give simultaneous pressure changes, but these activities are usually associated with external sphincter contraction, not with anal sphincter relaxation ( Chen et al, 2017 ) and they are associated with abdominal muscular action potentials whereas SPWs are not ( Corsetti et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In each manometric recording, obvious artifacts of simultaneous pressure events that spanned all recording channels were digitally removed as previously described …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In each manometric recording, obvious artifacts of simultaneous pressure events that spanned all recording channels were digitally removed as previously described. 27 The manometric traces consist of a variety of 'pressure events' (individual phasic pressure excursions recorded by a sensor). Two categories of rapid small amplitude pressure events were commonly identified.…”
Section: Analysis Of Manometric Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A segment immediately prior to bisacodyl administration was used given the number of motor patterns present in response to bisacodyl. These segments were analyzed using ImageJ where baseline corrections were made as outlined previously, a Gaussian filter was used with width of the Gaussian defined as 60 seconds. Upon determining the average pressure ± SD of the 5‐minutes intervals during baseline and immediately prior to bisacodyl administration in each volunteer, a non‐parametric Wilcoxon signed‐rank test was conducted, given the limited sample size, to assess whether there was a difference in basal intraluminal pressures.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%