Abstract:Neuropathic pain (NP) in cancer patients lacks standards for diagnosis. This study is aimed at reaching consensus on the application of the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) special interest group for neuropathic pain (NeuPSIG) criteria to the diagnosis of NP in cancer patients and on the relevance of patient-reported outcome (PRO) descriptors for the screening of NP in this population. An international group of 42 experts was invited to participate in a consensus process through a modifie… Show more
“…15 Although there has been a relative preponderance of neuropathic pain studies in the noncancer chronic pain populations, the generalizability of their findings to the cancer pain population has limitations. 16 An improved understanding and characterization of the clinical presentation of neuropathic cancer pain is, therefore, an important step in advancing its assessment and management. Furthermore, there are few reported data regarding cancer pain in Portuguese cancer care settings.…”
One in three patients with cancer have an NPC, which is independently associated with recent chemotherapy, surgery, adjuvant analgesic use, episodic incident and breakthrough pain, longer pain duration, higher pain intensity, and pelvic or perineal pain location.
“…15 Although there has been a relative preponderance of neuropathic pain studies in the noncancer chronic pain populations, the generalizability of their findings to the cancer pain population has limitations. 16 An improved understanding and characterization of the clinical presentation of neuropathic cancer pain is, therefore, an important step in advancing its assessment and management. Furthermore, there are few reported data regarding cancer pain in Portuguese cancer care settings.…”
One in three patients with cancer have an NPC, which is independently associated with recent chemotherapy, surgery, adjuvant analgesic use, episodic incident and breakthrough pain, longer pain duration, higher pain intensity, and pelvic or perineal pain location.
“…The resulting knowledge synthesis will guide therapeutic intervention strategies in cancer pain management and thereby optimize health-related quality of life. • Evaluate use of standardized criteria such as the NeuPSIG guidelines or algorithm; [49,52] • Consensus (Delphi process and surveys) on the standardized operationalization of domain assessments, particularly psychological distr ess and incident pain;…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that screening with a validated tool may improve the sensitivity of neuropathic pain detection, as demonstrated in cancer pain studies with the Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Pain Scale in Australia and the DN4 in Portugal [50,51]. Also, use of formal guidelines, such as the NeuPSIG guidelines or a standardized algorithm based on NeuPSIG criteria is likely to improve the accuracy of neuropathic pain diagnosis when compared to non-standardized clinical assessment [49,52].…”
Section: Pain Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pain is one of the most feared and distressing symptoms associated with cancer. Pooled prevalence estimates suggest that 55% (95% confidence interval, [46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64] of patients receiving active cancer treatment and 64% (58)(59)(60)(61)(62)(63)(64)(65)(66)(67)(68)(69)(70)(71)(72)(73)(74)(75) of those with advanced disease experience cancer pain [1]. Cancer is associated with ageing [2], and given current demographic trends that signal a dramatic increase in the elderly proportion of the population [3], an informed approach to cancer pain assessment and management is of great importance.…”
Introduction: Undertreatment of cancer pain is associated with inadequate assessment and inconsistent or non-standardized classification, resulting in failure to both appreciate its multidimensional nature and appropriately target therapeutic interventions. This review examines the classification of cancer pain with a focus on the progressive development of the Edmonton Classification System for Cancer Pain (ECS-CP); the appropriateness of its constituent features, associated outcomes and its potential future development in cancer pain classification. Areas covered: A Medline search from 1989 to November 2017, using combined terms 'cancer' or 'oncology', 'Edmonton', 'pain' or 'analgesia', and 'staging' or 'classification', identified 280 records. A total of 20 studies with empirical data relating to validation studies of the ECS-CP or evaluation of either its constituent or proposed domains were selected for inclusion in the core review. Expert commentary: The ECS-CP is a tool in evolution and a valid template for further cancer pain classification development. The assessment of ECS-CP domains requires a standardized approach. The domain ratings can inform the therapeutic strategy, and are associated with pain management outcomes, particularly stable pain control. The ECS-CP enables standardized reporting, based on patients' pain and related characteristics, and thus may improve the validity of comparisons across research study samples.
“…Four specific criteria used are summarised in Table 1 A recent Delphi survey about the use and adaptation of the NeuPSIG criteria for NP diagnosis to be applied in cancer patients was conducted where an international group of 29 experts participated; the results showed experts agreed on criteria 1-3 of the NeuPSIG, whereas for the fourth criteria (confirmation of lesion affecting the somatosensory system from diagnostic test or imaging) experts suggested that a distinction had to be made whether history and existing exams could explain the cause of the pain [14]. We have combined these recommendations to outline a clinically relevant process to classify NP.…”
Section: Grading System For Neuropathic Painmentioning
Purpose of review: Neuropathic pain can affect up to 40% in patients with cancer, which could be related to the tumour, treatment or from co-morbid diseases. Effective assessment to diagnose neuropathic pain is crucial in order to choose the right treatment. Recent findings: There is to date no systematic classification system; the Neuropathic Pain Special Interest Group of the International Association for the Study of Pain developed a neuropathic pain grading system intended to be used for both clinical and research purposes and a recent review describe a step-by-step process for applying the grading system in a clinical setting for cancer pain. Summary: We have combined these recommendations to outline a clinically relevant process to classify NP in patients with cancer.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.