2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2019.08.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of multiclass motor imagery EEG signal using sparsity approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CSP method maximizes the variance of signals for one class while minimizing the variance of the signals for the other. There are several methods to extend the CSP method to improve the classification accuracy, such as a filter bank common spatial pattern (FBCSP) [54] , sparsity approach [55] , [56] , a sparse filter band common spatial pattern (SFBCSP) [57] , temporally constrained sparse group spatial pattern (TSGSP) [58] . Therefore, we used the CSP feature as one feature, as the CSP feature is suitable for MI classification.…”
Section: Methods and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CSP method maximizes the variance of signals for one class while minimizing the variance of the signals for the other. There are several methods to extend the CSP method to improve the classification accuracy, such as a filter bank common spatial pattern (FBCSP) [54] , sparsity approach [55] , [56] , a sparse filter band common spatial pattern (SFBCSP) [57] , temporally constrained sparse group spatial pattern (TSGSP) [58] . Therefore, we used the CSP feature as one feature, as the CSP feature is suitable for MI classification.…”
Section: Methods and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have reported that the dominant frequency bands related to motor imagery were µ rhythms (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12) and β rhythms (14-30 Hz) [23]- [26]. In this paper, the EEG signal in the range of 4 to 40 Hz selects the sub-band for the corresponding band-pass filtering [9], [10], [27], [28].…”
Section: B Signal Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the machine learning and deep learning approaches have been employed to classify the MI activity where support vector machine (SVM) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) were observed to be the widely used (Padfield et al, 2019). The recent studies on MI EEG signal data classification are based on SVM (Jin et al, 2019), dynamic and self-adaptive algorithm (Belwafi et al, 2019), LDA (Suwannarat, Pan-ngum & Israsena, 2018), functional link neural network (Hettiarachchi et al, 2018), Gaussian mixture model (He et al, 2016), sparsity approach (Sreeja & Samanta, 2019), k-nearest neighbour (k-NN), and Naïve-Bayesian (Bhaduri et al, 2016). Most of these classifiers are primarily constructed for binary classification problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%