2012 16th IEEE Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference 2012
DOI: 10.1109/melcon.2012.6196442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of multichannel uterine EMG signals by using a weighted majority voting decision fusion rule

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most studies, including [10], use four electrodes although one study utilizes two [12]. In a series of other studies, sixteen electrodes were used [13][14][15][16][17][18], and a high density grid of 64 small electrodes was used in [19]. The results show that EHG may vary from women to women.…”
Section: Electrohysterographymentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Most studies, including [10], use four electrodes although one study utilizes two [12]. In a series of other studies, sixteen electrodes were used [13][14][15][16][17][18], and a high density grid of 64 small electrodes was used in [19]. The results show that EHG may vary from women to women.…”
Section: Electrohysterographymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This was in contrast to the entire thirty coefficients, whose accuracy was 53.11% (±10.5), and sample entropy, which was51.67% (±14.6). In addition, Support Vector Machine (SVM) classification has been used in [13][14][15]. They classify contractions into labour or non-labour using different locations on the abdomen.…”
Section: Electroencephalogram (Eeg) Signals Using Multi-way Array Decmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The feature vectors include the power of the EMG signal, and the median frequency. The highest accuracy for a single SVM classifier, at one particular location on the abdomen, was 78.4% (Moslem et al, 2011a(Moslem et al, , 2012, whilst the overall classification accuracy, when SVMs were combined, was 88.4% (Moslem et al, 2011b).…”
Section: Term and Preterm Classificationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Using a feature set comprised of peak frequency, median frequency, root mean squares and sample entropy (extracted from the raw signals on Channel 3 in the 0.3-3 Hz frequency band), the algorithm was evaluated and the results show an overall accuracy of 70.82%. Support vector machines (SVM) have featured widely in research on preterm deliveries and are considered robust algorithms for classification tasks (Moslem et al, 2011a(Moslem et al, , 2011b(Moslem et al, , 2012. The primary focus has been to classify contractions as labour or non-labour events, using different locations on the abdomen.…”
Section: Term and Preterm Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%