2017
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1703.05266
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of Minimal Polygons with Specified Singularity Content

Abstract: It is known that there are only finitely many mutation-equivalence classes with a given singularity content, and each of these equivalence classes contains only finitely many minimal polygons. We describe an efficient algorithm to classify these minimal polygons. To illustrate this algorithm we compute all mutation-equivalence classes of Fano polygons with basket of singularities given by (i) B = {m1 × 1 3 (1, 1), m2 × 1 6 (1, 1)} and (ii) B = {m × 1 5 (1, 1)}.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is an interesting problem to complete classifications of Fano polygons by singularity content, and some such results are available [5,6,12]. In this vain the first main result of this paper is as follows: Theorem 2.4.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…It is an interesting problem to complete classifications of Fano polygons by singularity content, and some such results are available [5,6,12]. In this vain the first main result of this paper is as follows: Theorem 2.4.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The toric varieties to which such a surface can degenerate are classified in [9]; applying Laurent inversion to these cases gives models for these surfaces. The main results of [9] show that either such a surface contains a single 1 k (1, 1) singularity, for k ∈ {3, 5, 6}, or is one of three exceptional cases. In this section we show that all of these surfaces are hypersurfaces in weighted projective spaces.…”
Section: Surfaces With Larger Basketsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section we show that all of these surfaces are hypersurfaces in weighted projective spaces. In particular, consider polygons 1.13 and 1.14 from [9]. While we use Laurent inversion here we could also use the Ehrhart series of the dual polygons to those appearing in [9] to guess the hypersurface model.…”
Section: Surfaces With Larger Basketsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations