Abstract:Micro X-ray fluorescence (microXRF) has been used nondestructively to investigate elemental heterogeneity by constructing two-dimensional maps of elemental concentrations in reference materials. microXRF probes sample sizes well below the 100 mg mass usually recommended for reference materials by NIST. Multivariate methods of analysis, such as principal-component analysis (PCA), show promise in identifying whether "nugget" effects exist within a material, where an element is enriched in small, isolated areas o… Show more
“…bottles, ingots, or vials) as well as within units. For evaluations of single samples, a method using PCA has already been demonstrated that compares the behaviors of constituent elements and enables the analyst to calculate the estimated minimum mass for each element 6. This approach for estimating heterogeneity within a sample can be extended to cover a set of samples plotting all samples together in principal component space as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other authors have shown principal component analysis (PCA) to be a useful tool for processing the large amount of data arising from analyses by µXRF 5. Using descriptive statistics of µXRF data instead of the raw data in combination with PCA has yielded a method6 which can predict the minimum amount of sample that can be used with confidence that nugget effects are not contributing significantly to the overall uncertainty. This method was demonstrated for several reference materials, and a minimum recommended sample mass was calculated for Standard Reference Material (SRM) 1577c (Bovine Liver) and compared to another study3 which used Monte Carlo techniques to predict minimum sample size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using PCA has yielded a relatively simple method for classifying the heterogeneity of a sample, a foundation for the work discussed in this paper. However, all of the prior work using this method6 only considered a small part of one sample which has been analyzed to represent the heterogeneity of an entire material. A related procedure for applying this method to larger sets of samples will be presented with emphasis on sampling type and discussion of how much data must be taken before an accurate representation of the material is obtained.…”
Principal component analysis (PCA), microbeam X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (µXRF), and Monte Carlo simulations are used to illustrate a methodology for assessing the sample microheterogeneity for large sets of materials. PCA is demonstrated to determine a minimum sample size that can be used without concern that sample heterogeneity is contributing significantly to measurement uncertainty. Sampling methodology is critical for constructing an accurate PCA model of material heterogeneity, and the amount of data required is discussed using both empirical data and simulated data generated using a Monte Carlo approach. Random data collection is compared to rastering across a sample as typically done with microanalytical techniques. The use of random data collection is shown to reduce analysis time by one order of magnitude for some samples without significantly reducing the quality of data for estimating minimum sample size. Examples are shown for Standard Reference Material (SRM) 1635a Trace Elements in Coal (subbituminous) and SRM 1729 Tin Alloy (97Sn-3Pb) with estimated minimum sample sizes of 2 mg and 640 µg, respectively. Published 2011.
“…bottles, ingots, or vials) as well as within units. For evaluations of single samples, a method using PCA has already been demonstrated that compares the behaviors of constituent elements and enables the analyst to calculate the estimated minimum mass for each element 6. This approach for estimating heterogeneity within a sample can be extended to cover a set of samples plotting all samples together in principal component space as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other authors have shown principal component analysis (PCA) to be a useful tool for processing the large amount of data arising from analyses by µXRF 5. Using descriptive statistics of µXRF data instead of the raw data in combination with PCA has yielded a method6 which can predict the minimum amount of sample that can be used with confidence that nugget effects are not contributing significantly to the overall uncertainty. This method was demonstrated for several reference materials, and a minimum recommended sample mass was calculated for Standard Reference Material (SRM) 1577c (Bovine Liver) and compared to another study3 which used Monte Carlo techniques to predict minimum sample size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using PCA has yielded a relatively simple method for classifying the heterogeneity of a sample, a foundation for the work discussed in this paper. However, all of the prior work using this method6 only considered a small part of one sample which has been analyzed to represent the heterogeneity of an entire material. A related procedure for applying this method to larger sets of samples will be presented with emphasis on sampling type and discussion of how much data must be taken before an accurate representation of the material is obtained.…”
Principal component analysis (PCA), microbeam X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (µXRF), and Monte Carlo simulations are used to illustrate a methodology for assessing the sample microheterogeneity for large sets of materials. PCA is demonstrated to determine a minimum sample size that can be used without concern that sample heterogeneity is contributing significantly to measurement uncertainty. Sampling methodology is critical for constructing an accurate PCA model of material heterogeneity, and the amount of data required is discussed using both empirical data and simulated data generated using a Monte Carlo approach. Random data collection is compared to rastering across a sample as typically done with microanalytical techniques. The use of random data collection is shown to reduce analysis time by one order of magnitude for some samples without significantly reducing the quality of data for estimating minimum sample size. Examples are shown for Standard Reference Material (SRM) 1635a Trace Elements in Coal (subbituminous) and SRM 1729 Tin Alloy (97Sn-3Pb) with estimated minimum sample sizes of 2 mg and 640 µg, respectively. Published 2011.
“…, ). There have been a few studies on RM mapping (Eggins and Shelley , Molloy and Sieber ). One interesting contribution was provided by Molloy and Sieber (), who mapped RMs and fed their results into principal component analysis to determine the presence of nuggets.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, beam diameters have been varied with position relative to the sample recorded (at the centre versus the border of the RM sample) before computing the average and standard deviation (Wilson et al 2002, Jochum et al 2005, 2011. There have been a few studies on RM mapping (Eggins andShelley 2002, Molloy andSieber 2008). One interesting contribution was provided by Molloy and Sieber (2008), who mapped RMs and fed their results into principal component analysis to determine the presence of nuggets.…”
Geochemical reference materials (RMs) for microbeam techniques are typically characterised by averages and dispersion statistics (e.g., standard deviation, variance) that are calculated for a number of measurements (beam shots). It is proposed that the mapping of RMs will add spatial information that better characterises the grouping and magnitudes of the heterogeneities and provides the information necessary to define a minimum analytical mass. A simple mathematical solution is proposed, which can be easily computed and understood. The analogous notions to sill and range from geostatistics are applied to the minimum analytical mass versus the relative standard deviation. To assess grouping and magnitudes of the heterogeneities, a ‘proximity number’ is computed for each average value ± ‘n’ standard deviations (magnitude). Different chemical anomalies have been simulated to demonstrate the behaviour of the proximity number. To further test the proposed spatial geochemistry concept, sulfide‐ and oxide‐bearing RMs have been selected because many are crippled with nugget effect. They have been mapped with a micro‐XRF apparatus, and results are presented for CHR‐Bkg, CHR‐Pt+, MASS‐1, MASS‐3, WMS‐1 and WMS‐1a. MASS‐1 and MASS‐3 are the most suitable RMs for microbeam techniques. Spatial geochemistry offers a new approach to better characterise reference materials.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.