2020 IEEE International Conference on Electro Information Technology (EIT) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/eit48999.2020.9208290
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of Microcalcifications in Mammograms using 2D Discrete Wavelet Transform and Random Forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This research presented an automated and computer-based approach to classify breast microcalcifications on mammography images using discrete wavelet transform-random forest (DWT-RF). The results show an accuracy of 95%, sensitivity of 93%, and specificity of 97% 16) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This research presented an automated and computer-based approach to classify breast microcalcifications on mammography images using discrete wavelet transform-random forest (DWT-RF). The results show an accuracy of 95%, sensitivity of 93%, and specificity of 97% 16) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Random forest performance was compared to other suggested approaches, and it was determined that random forest performed well. Fadil et al [ 55 ] developed a computer-based automated approach for detecting and segmenting the MC regions in mammogram images using the discrete wavelet transform and random forest. The results suggest that RF achieved an accuracy of 0.83 and a sensitivity of 0.78.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various features have been studied in the literature to classify benign and malignant microcalcifications. Research by Fadil et al [15] used 2D discrete wavelet transform for contrast enhancement of the microcalcifications and extracted eight textural features on the GLCM, achieving 95% accuracy and 0.92 AUC using the random forest (RF) classifier. On the other hand, Suhail et al [46] present a way to obtain a single feature value by applying a scalable linear fisher discriminant analysis (LDA) approach, achieving up to 96% accuracy with 0.95 AUC using SVM.…”
Section: Comparative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such features included intensity, statistical, shape, and textural features [5]. The grey-level cooccurrence matrix (GLCM), which calculates the occurrence of various grey levels in a region of interest (ROI), is a well-known texture feature and is utilised extensively in the literature [5,[15][16][17]. Nevertheless, all of these features focus on local information of the images and are often burdened with details, resulting in data complexity [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%