2021
DOI: 10.1080/03091902.2020.1853837
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of malignant lung cancer using deep learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subramanian et al [48] proposed a deep learning framework using CNN based methods such as AlexNet, LeNet and VGG16. Kumar and Bakariya [51] used deep learning methods to find the presence of malignant cancers in CT images. Kriegsmann et al [52] used deep learning models to classify and differentiate non-small cell lung cancer from small cell lung cancer.…”
Section: B Deep Learning Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subramanian et al [48] proposed a deep learning framework using CNN based methods such as AlexNet, LeNet and VGG16. Kumar and Bakariya [51] used deep learning methods to find the presence of malignant cancers in CT images. Kriegsmann et al [52] used deep learning models to classify and differentiate non-small cell lung cancer from small cell lung cancer.…”
Section: B Deep Learning Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method achieved results that exceeded the techniques of machine learning. Vinod et al [ 22 ] designed a method to identify pulmonary nodules from regions of interest. The watershed algorithm and Gabor filter were applied to segment the lung regions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Characteristics commonly found in CADx systems for diagnosis of nodule malignancy include but are not limited to 2D Convolutional Neural Networks (2D CNNs) [12] [13], multi-view 2D CNNs [14], 3D CNNs [15] [16], and multi-view 3D Squeeze and Excitation CNNs [20]. Some current research applies secondary methods such as Gabor filters [17] [18][19] and attention modules [21] in conjunction with the aforementioned network architectures to further improve classification results. For both network training as well as the evaluation and testing, the majority of approaches employ the Lung Image Database Consortium Image Collection (LIDC) database [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%