2016
DOI: 10.2174/1574362411666160614083720
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of Malignant and Benign Micro Calcifications from Mammogram Using Optimized Cascading Classifier

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specificity, execution time and false positive rate were considered for performance analysis. Hence, experimental results shown, specificity values are 0.992, execution time has 1 s per slice and false positive rate has 0.075 respectively (Krishnamoorthy et al, 2016).…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specificity, execution time and false positive rate were considered for performance analysis. Hence, experimental results shown, specificity values are 0.992, execution time has 1 s per slice and false positive rate has 0.075 respectively (Krishnamoorthy et al, 2016).…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it has been widely used in real-time computer vision applications such as face detection [18], vehicle detection [19], pedestrian detection [20] and football detection in robotic soccer competitions [21]. The cascade classifier was also used in breast cancer detection in mammograms [22].…”
Section: Model Training For the Cascade Classifiermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third layer is an 11-layer convolution with no non-linearity. The researchers found that if ReLU is repeated, deep networks only have the capability of a linear classifier in the non-zero volume output domain [3]. A residual connection is also a crucial component of the bottleneck residual block.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%