Abstract:A classification system of various forms of major newborn birth injuries is clearly lacking in the literature. Currently, no scales exist for distinguishing degrees, extent, or distinctions of major birth injuries. The purpose of this study was to use published and online literature to explore the timing, prediction, and outcomes of major newborn birth injuries. Potential antecedents and causes were used in depicting what were reported to be major birth injuries. The outcome of this literature search was the d… Show more
“…Through a population‐based national estimate it was determined that the rate of birth trauma in the US is higher than a majority of studies have previously reported. Health professionals may have the ability to decrease the number and rate of infants diagnosed with birth trauma by recognising perinatal risk factors for birth trauma and using technological advancements (such as ultrasonography and fetal monitoring) before attempting a vaginal delivery 19 . In addition, further birth trauma research, including more in‐depth classification (such as an expansion of the work done by Pressler 19 ) and follow‐up of infants who are diagnosed with birth trauma, will better quantify the morbidity and mortality of birth trauma by type and among infants and women with various birth trauma risk factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Health professionals may have the ability to decrease the number and rate of infants diagnosed with birth trauma by recognising perinatal risk factors for birth trauma and using technological advancements (such as ultrasonography and fetal monitoring) before attempting a vaginal delivery 19 . In addition, further birth trauma research, including more in‐depth classification (such as an expansion of the work done by Pressler 19 ) and follow‐up of infants who are diagnosed with birth trauma, will better quantify the morbidity and mortality of birth trauma by type and among infants and women with various birth trauma risk factors. Prevention of birth trauma will also reduce the number of stresses that it places on the health care system because neonates with birth trauma were shown in this study to have higher costs, greater lengths of stay, and have more medical procedures than neonates not diagnosed with birth trauma.…”
The rate of birth trauma in the US has been reported to range between 0.2 and 37 birth traumas per 1000 births. Because of the minimal number of population-based studies and the inconsistencies among the published birth trauma rates, the rate of birth trauma in the US remains unclear. This is a cross-sectional study that was conducted using 890 582 in-hospital birth discharges from the 2003 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Kids' Inpatient Database. A neonate was defined as having birth trauma if their hospital discharge record contained an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis code from 767.0 to 767.9. Weighted data were used to calculate rates for all birth traumas and specific types of birth traumas, and rates and odds ratios by demographic, hospital and clinical variables. Weighted data represented a national estimate of 3 920 787 in-hospital births. Birth trauma was estimated to occur in 29 per 1000 births. The three most frequently diagnosed birth traumas were injuries to the scalp, other injuries to the skeleton and fracture of the clavicle. Significant univariable predictors for birth trauma included male gender, Asian or Pacific Islander race, living in urban or wealthy areas, being born in Western, urban and/or teaching hospital, a co-diagnosis of high birthweight, instrument delivery, malpresentation and other complications during labour and delivery. Birth trauma risk factors including those identified in this study may be useful to consider during labour and delivery. In conclusion, additional research is necessary to identify ways to reduce birth trauma and subsequent infant morbidity and mortality.
“…Through a population‐based national estimate it was determined that the rate of birth trauma in the US is higher than a majority of studies have previously reported. Health professionals may have the ability to decrease the number and rate of infants diagnosed with birth trauma by recognising perinatal risk factors for birth trauma and using technological advancements (such as ultrasonography and fetal monitoring) before attempting a vaginal delivery 19 . In addition, further birth trauma research, including more in‐depth classification (such as an expansion of the work done by Pressler 19 ) and follow‐up of infants who are diagnosed with birth trauma, will better quantify the morbidity and mortality of birth trauma by type and among infants and women with various birth trauma risk factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Health professionals may have the ability to decrease the number and rate of infants diagnosed with birth trauma by recognising perinatal risk factors for birth trauma and using technological advancements (such as ultrasonography and fetal monitoring) before attempting a vaginal delivery 19 . In addition, further birth trauma research, including more in‐depth classification (such as an expansion of the work done by Pressler 19 ) and follow‐up of infants who are diagnosed with birth trauma, will better quantify the morbidity and mortality of birth trauma by type and among infants and women with various birth trauma risk factors. Prevention of birth trauma will also reduce the number of stresses that it places on the health care system because neonates with birth trauma were shown in this study to have higher costs, greater lengths of stay, and have more medical procedures than neonates not diagnosed with birth trauma.…”
The rate of birth trauma in the US has been reported to range between 0.2 and 37 birth traumas per 1000 births. Because of the minimal number of population-based studies and the inconsistencies among the published birth trauma rates, the rate of birth trauma in the US remains unclear. This is a cross-sectional study that was conducted using 890 582 in-hospital birth discharges from the 2003 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Kids' Inpatient Database. A neonate was defined as having birth trauma if their hospital discharge record contained an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis code from 767.0 to 767.9. Weighted data were used to calculate rates for all birth traumas and specific types of birth traumas, and rates and odds ratios by demographic, hospital and clinical variables. Weighted data represented a national estimate of 3 920 787 in-hospital births. Birth trauma was estimated to occur in 29 per 1000 births. The three most frequently diagnosed birth traumas were injuries to the scalp, other injuries to the skeleton and fracture of the clavicle. Significant univariable predictors for birth trauma included male gender, Asian or Pacific Islander race, living in urban or wealthy areas, being born in Western, urban and/or teaching hospital, a co-diagnosis of high birthweight, instrument delivery, malpresentation and other complications during labour and delivery. Birth trauma risk factors including those identified in this study may be useful to consider during labour and delivery. In conclusion, additional research is necessary to identify ways to reduce birth trauma and subsequent infant morbidity and mortality.
“…Birth-related injuries are not uncommon, but they account for fewer than 2% of neonatal deaths [4]. The rates of infant mortality due to birth trauma fell significantly during the last two decades.…”
Traumatic epiphyseal dislocation related to birth injury is uncommon. The authors report a case of slipped distal femoral epiphysis during a breech presentation in a twin pregnancy birthing process, diagnosed by ultrasonography. This type of separation could be difficult to detect in the newborn on plain radiographs because of the non-ossification of the epiphysis. Therefore, the use of sonography is helpful to make an early and accurate diagnosis in order to avoid malunion and deformities of the affected limb. Through this case report we will see the diagnostic value of high-resolution ultrasonography in diagnosing newborn injuries of the limbs, and particularly in the diagnosis of radiographically occult epiphyseal separation.
“…In the immediate postnatal time period, a wide spectrum of extracranial, cranial (skull), and intracranial lesions may be encountered . Depending on the severity and type of the injury, location of the lesion, exerted mass effect on adjacent brain structures, development of primary (eg, anemia and hypovolemic shock in subgaleal hematomas), and/or secondary (eg, hyperbilirubinemia in subgaleal hematomas and secondary ischemic lesions in skull fractures with midline shift) complications and presence of complicating factors outside of the central nervous system (eg, systemic hypoxia, hypoperfusion, or sepsis), various degrees of reversible or irreversible brain injury may result.…”
Section: Parturitional Skull and Brain Injuriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intracranial injuries occur in 5–6/10,000 live births in the United States. Risk factors include forceps delivery (x6), vacuum extraction, prolonged delivery, and macrosomia . A variety of lesions may be encountered, which include all well‐known posttraumatic lesions like epidural hematoma (EDH), SDH, subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), IVH, and parenchymal contusion or laceration.…”
Section: Parturitional Skull and Brain Injuriesmentioning
Parturitional injuries refer to injuries sustained during and secondary to fetal delivery. The skull, brain, and head and neck regions are frequently involved. Accurate differentiation and classification of the various injuries is essential for treatment, prognosis, and parental counseling. In this review, we discuss the various "bumps and lumps" that maybe encountered along the neonatal skull as well as the most frequent calvarial and intracranial parturitional injuries. In addition, a short discussion of the most common head and neck, facial, and spinal lesions is included. Various mimickers and risk factors are also presented.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.