2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12880-018-0286-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of lung nodules in CT scans using three-dimensional deep convolutional neural networks with a checkpoint ensemble method

Abstract: BackgroundAccurately detecting and examining lung nodules early is key in diagnosing lung cancers and thus one of the best ways to prevent lung cancer deaths. Radiologists spend countless hours detecting small spherical-shaped nodules in computed tomography (CT) images. In addition, even after detecting nodule candidates, a considerable amount of effort and time is required for them to determine whether they are real nodules. The aim of this paper is to introduce a high performance nodule classification method… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They evaluated their proposed system on LIDC-IDRI datasets achieving a sensitivity of (94%) and specificity of(91%). Hwejin Jung et al [18] introduced a method for nodule classification, which uses three dimensional deep convolutional neural networks (3DCNNs) and checkpoint ensemble method to discriminate nodules between non-nodules, achieving a CPM score of 0.910.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They evaluated their proposed system on LIDC-IDRI datasets achieving a sensitivity of (94%) and specificity of(91%). Hwejin Jung et al [18] introduced a method for nodule classification, which uses three dimensional deep convolutional neural networks (3DCNNs) and checkpoint ensemble method to discriminate nodules between non-nodules, achieving a CPM score of 0.910.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CNN [24] 70.23% 4.7 74.01% 79.47% DFCNet [24] 73.14% 4.2 80.12% 81.95 RUN:Resdiual-U-Net [12] 90.9% 2 --D48 [18] 91.3% 1.6 94.8% 98.4% 3D CMixNet Faster-RCNN [17] 90% 1.1 --DeepNet [41] 84.8% 1 --ResNet [41] 86.7% 1 --ResNet+HL [41] 90.5% 1 --ESB-ALL [18] 93.3% 0.7 96.3% 99.3% Ours Deeplab-V3 plus(ex_65) + FRCNN-Inception-V2 96.4% 0.6 97% 99.4% Table 7. The confusion matrix of the Deeplab-V3 plus(ex_65) + FRCNN-Inception-V2 model.…”
Section: Model Senstivity Fps/scan Accuracy Specificitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another research group Jung et al [ 12 , 15 ] model performs lower in accuracy of 96.30% in comparison to the Toğaçar et al model accuracy of 99.51%, similarly because no image augmentation and feature selection technique was used, whereas Toğaçar et al [ 13 ] used the mRMR technique with better results. Furthermore, Jung et al research team developed a three-dimensional ensemble CNN which required more training data and computational power to run [ 15 ].…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jaiswal et al [27] used Mask-RCNN, a deep neural network, which utilizes both global and local features for pulmonary image segmentation combined with image augmentation, alongside with dropout and L2 regularization, for pneumonia identification. Jung et al [28] use a 3D deep CNN (3D DCNN) which has shortcut connections and a 3D DCNN with dense connections. The shortcuts and dense connections solve the gradient vanishing problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%