2014
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1406.3049
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of linkage systems

Abstract: In 1972, R. Carter introduced admissible diagrams to classify conjugacy classes in a finite Weyl group W . For any two non-orthogonal roots α and β corresponding to vertices of admissible diagram, we draw the dotted (resp. solid) edge {α, β} if (α, β) > 0 (resp. (α, β) < 0). The diagram with properties of admissible diagram and possibly containing dotted edges are said to be Carter diagrams. For any Carter diagram Γ, we introduce the partial Cartan matrix BΓ, which is analogous to the Cartan matrix associated … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• For inverses of partial Cartan matrices, and some examples of their usage, see [Stk,]; the inverses of Cartan matrices are also recalled there (Tables A.14-A.15).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…• For inverses of partial Cartan matrices, and some examples of their usage, see [Stk,]; the inverses of Cartan matrices are also recalled there (Tables A.14-A.15).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also corrected and widened the list of references (and the range of applications) of inverses of Cartan matrices as compared with those given in [WZ], e.g., the explicit form of inverse Cartan matrices of finite-dimensional simple Lie algebras is reproduced in [WZ] as if new, though well-known, see [D1,OV,Stk]. These omissions and the desire to solve the problem considered, but not solved, in [WZ], except for occasional coincidences of Cartan matrices with Gram matrices of non-degenerate invariant symmetric bilinear forms (NISes) on the (super)algebras considered, is what prompted our work.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%