2019
DOI: 10.3217/978-3-85125-682-6-62
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of imagined spoken word-pairs using convolutional neural networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, TL assumes their domain is different, or the future labelling task may differ. Some studies reported that TL did not decrease the accuracy [36], [37]. However, as the accuracy was still poor (35-60%), it needs further observation.…”
Section: Intra-subject and Inter-subject Problemmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, TL assumes their domain is different, or the future labelling task may differ. Some studies reported that TL did not decrease the accuracy [36], [37]. However, as the accuracy was still poor (35-60%), it needs further observation.…”
Section: Intra-subject and Inter-subject Problemmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Similar to Arizona State University's dataset, the studies on Coretto's dataset also achieved the highest accuracy by implementing a deep learning model (30% for vowel classification [35] and 62.37% for word classification [36]). It was validated by a general CV, as shown in Table V.…”
Section: Model Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations