2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2009.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of hypoglycemia awareness in people with type 1 diabetes in clinical practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
41
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
41
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, classification of awareness status was based upon three validated methods (40), resulting in two clearly separated groups as subsequently confirmed by the differences in hypoglycemia symptom scores during hypoglycemia as well as in the counterregulatory responses. CGM was also applied in order to avoid any symptomatic and asymptomatic hypoglycemia 5 days prior to the study, which could potentially blunt the symptomatic and hormonal responses to hypoglycemia induced during the study (34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, classification of awareness status was based upon three validated methods (40), resulting in two clearly separated groups as subsequently confirmed by the differences in hypoglycemia symptom scores during hypoglycemia as well as in the counterregulatory responses. CGM was also applied in order to avoid any symptomatic and asymptomatic hypoglycemia 5 days prior to the study, which could potentially blunt the symptomatic and hormonal responses to hypoglycemia induced during the study (34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical scoring of symptoms has been developed (66)(67)(68). Because impaired awareness is inducible and reversible, such a classification cannot be assumed to be stable.…”
Section: Pathophysiology Of Hypoglycemiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients answering "always" were categorized as being "aware", those answering "usually" as having "impaired awareness" and those answering "occasionally" or "never" as being "unaware" [10]. This method was chosen because it is simple and is proven to be equal to other methods to assess the state of awareness [11]. The Regional Committee on Biomedical Research Ethics approved the study and written informed consent was obtained from all participants.…”
Section: • Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%