1999
DOI: 10.1109/36.763300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of hyperdimensional data based on feature and decision fusion approaches using projection pursuit, majority voting, and neural networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, there has also been growing interest in fusing several properties (e.g., texture and spectral information) of single data source (termed feature fusion) or certain properties of multidata sources (SAR and optical sensors) under centralized decision (termed decision fusion) to improve classification accuracy [29]- [31]. Feature fusion schemes retain the best features to improve the classification accuracy locally, while decision fusion schemes integrate local classifiers to improve the overall performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In recent years, there has also been growing interest in fusing several properties (e.g., texture and spectral information) of single data source (termed feature fusion) or certain properties of multidata sources (SAR and optical sensors) under centralized decision (termed decision fusion) to improve classification accuracy [29]- [31]. Feature fusion schemes retain the best features to improve the classification accuracy locally, while decision fusion schemes integrate local classifiers to improve the overall performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feature fusion schemes retain the best features to improve the classification accuracy locally, while decision fusion schemes integrate local classifiers to improve the overall performance. Several studies have been published in this regard [29]- [31]. In [29], the dimensions of five different classes were reduced and then used to generate the final decision through majority voting and a neural network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these studies fusion is performed on the classifiers' soft outputs (either probabilistic or fuzzy), through simple weighted averaging schemes [20,21,24], more complex fusion operators [22], or even by considering the stacked (soft) outputs of the multiple classifiers as a new feature space and subsequently training a new classifier on this new space [23]. Decision fusion has also been exploited for effectively tackling the very high dimensionality of hyperspectral data, by training multiple classifiers on different feature subsets derived from the source image and then combining their outputs [25][26][27][28][29]. The feature subsets are derived either through some appropriate feature extraction algorithm [25] or-more commonly-by applying some feature subgroups selection process [26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decision fusion has also been exploited for effectively tackling the very high dimensionality of hyperspectral data, by training multiple classifiers on different feature subsets derived from the source image and then combining their outputs [25][26][27][28][29]. The feature subsets are derived either through some appropriate feature extraction algorithm [25] or-more commonly-by applying some feature subgroups selection process [26][27][28][29]. Α more direct decision fusion approach combines the outputs of multiple different classifiers applied to a common data source [30][31][32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decision-level fusion is a high-level data fusion technique [7,8]. It aims to increase classification accuracy by combining multiple outputs from multiple data sets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%