2019
DOI: 10.1101/680975
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of human white blood cells using machine learning for stain-free imaging flow cytometry

Abstract: Imaging flow cytometry (IFC) produces up to 12 different information-rich images of single cells at a throughput of 5000 cells per second. Yet often, cell populations are still studied using manual gating, a technique that has several drawbacks. Firstly, it is hard to reproduce. Secondly, it is subjective and biased. And thirdly, it is time-consuming for large experiments. Therefore, it would be advantageous to replace manual gating with an automated process, which could be based on stain-free measurements ori… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, lower resolution imaging and the flowing nature of the cells may make it more difficult to detect the intracellular structures of small T cells. Although the resulting images may be different enough to require a distinct CNN, recent advances in CNNs for imaging flow cytometry suggest our pipeline could be optimized for this practical setting. Overall, our strong results demonstrate the feasibility of classifying T cells directly from autofluorescence intensity images, which can guide future work to bring this technology to pre‐clinical and clinical applications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, lower resolution imaging and the flowing nature of the cells may make it more difficult to detect the intracellular structures of small T cells. Although the resulting images may be different enough to require a distinct CNN, recent advances in CNNs for imaging flow cytometry suggest our pipeline could be optimized for this practical setting. Overall, our strong results demonstrate the feasibility of classifying T cells directly from autofluorescence intensity images, which can guide future work to bring this technology to pre‐clinical and clinical applications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, to sort T cells in practice, the classifier would need to be coupled to a flow sorter. The flowing nature of the cells may make the resulting images different enough to require a distinct CNN, which is not an obstacle given recent advances in CNNs for imaging flow cytometry 10,21,22,34,48,49 . Overall, our strong results demonstrate the feasibility of classifying T cells directly from autofluorescence intensity images, which can guide future work to bring this technology to pre-clinical and clinical applications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, online image analysis often requires a too high computational power such that real-time cell sorting cannot easily be done. Several machine learning approaches have recently been proposed to automatically analyze the big amount of data generated by label-free imaging flow cytometry 8,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19] , although in most of them the image processing is carried out offline. Exceptions are 15,16,20 , where single-particle classifications respectively took < 1 ms , 0.2 ms and 3.6 ms when accelerated by a GPU.…”
Section: Flow Cytometers Are Instruments Able To Analyze and Charactementioning
confidence: 99%