2013
DOI: 10.1002/minf.201300020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of High‐Activity Tiagabine Analogs by Binary QSAR Modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the basis of a set of tiagabine analogs from literature sources, we recently investigated ligand-based structure–activity relationships of the compound class. 16 Briefly, binary QSAR allowed classification of GABA uptake inhibitors into active and inactive bins by using the degree of rigidity and polarity distribution as main descriptors. With the increasing knowledge provided by the X-ray structures of analogous transport proteins, 17 structure-based approaches for elucidating the molecular basis of drug–transporter interaction also become feasible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of a set of tiagabine analogs from literature sources, we recently investigated ligand-based structure–activity relationships of the compound class. 16 Briefly, binary QSAR allowed classification of GABA uptake inhibitors into active and inactive bins by using the degree of rigidity and polarity distribution as main descriptors. With the increasing knowledge provided by the X-ray structures of analogous transport proteins, 17 structure-based approaches for elucidating the molecular basis of drug–transporter interaction also become feasible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this respect, contingency matrix and VSA descriptors turned out to be well-suited to describe the dataset. Moreover, as 2D-QSAR is a versatile method for capturing SAR information, therefore the test compounds were easily differentiated as active ones having ortho-substitution in the linker region of the derivatives of nipecotic acid from the inactive compounds (Jurik et al, 2013 ).…”
Section: Pharmacoinformatics Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, various antagonists of hGAT1, including nipecotic acid, guvacine, proline, pyrrolidine, azetidine and THPO derivatives (Dalby, 2000; Andersen et al, 2001; Clausen et al, 2005; Fülep et al, 2006; Faust et al, 2010; Hellenbrand et al, 2016; Schmidt, Höfner & Wanner, 2017; Lutz et al, 2018; Tóth, Höfner & Wanner, 2018), have been synthesized and pharmacologically tested and optimized using structure–activity relationship (SAR) data. Additionally, several ligand-based strategies including 2D QSAR (Jurik et al, 2013), CoMFA (Zheng et al, 2006) and pharmacophore models (Hirayama, Díez-Sampedro & Wright, 2001; Nowaczyk et al, 2018) have been developed to optimize small molecule inhibitors against hGAT1. However, most of these studies were class specific, focusing on nipecotic acid derivatives (Petrera et al, 2015), Tiagabine analogs (Jurik et al, 2015) and triarylnipecotic acid derivatives (Dhar et al, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%