2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00705-013-1902-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of HHV-6A and HHV-6B as distinct viruses

Abstract: Shortly after the discovery of human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6), two distinct variants, HHV-6A and HHV-6B, were identified. In 2012, the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) classified HHV-6A and HHV-6B as separate viruses. This review outlines several of the documented epidemiological, biological, and immunological distinctions between HHV-6A and HHV-6B, which support the ICTV classification. The utilization of virus-specific clinical and laboratory assays for distinguishing HHV-6A and HHV-6B is n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

3
222
2
14

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 293 publications
(241 citation statements)
references
References 134 publications
3
222
2
14
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite their high genome sequence similarities, these viruses possess different biological and epidemiological properties (1). HHV-6B is a ubiquitous virus that infects almost 100% of the human population.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite their high genome sequence similarities, these viruses possess different biological and epidemiological properties (1). HHV-6B is a ubiquitous virus that infects almost 100% of the human population.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They share more than 90% nucleotide sequence identity but differ in several genetic features and clinical manifestations (1,2). HHV-6B has long been identified as the etiological agent for exanthem subitum, a common infant febrile illness (3), while primary infection with HHV- 6A has not yet been conclusively associated with any specific disease.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially, HHV-6B and HHV-6A were classified as two variants of HHV-6; however, they are now classified as two virus species due to their different bio-characteristics (1)(2)(3)(4)(5). One of the striking differences between these two viruses is receptor ligand usage.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%