2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105604
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of heart sound signals using a novel deep WaveNet model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Merging the DWT and MFCC features, centroid displacement based K-NN, DNN and SVM respectively yields an accuracy of 97.4%, 92.1% and 97.9% [18]. In the same vein, using the same dataset, a recent study has proposed WaveNet, a novel 1D CNN network having residual blocks with dilated 1D CNN and multiple skip connections [19]. Upon 10-fold cross-validation, they have achieved training accuracy of 97% and approximately 90% validation accuracy.…”
Section: A Physiological Origin Of Cardiac Auscultationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Merging the DWT and MFCC features, centroid displacement based K-NN, DNN and SVM respectively yields an accuracy of 97.4%, 92.1% and 97.9% [18]. In the same vein, using the same dataset, a recent study has proposed WaveNet, a novel 1D CNN network having residual blocks with dilated 1D CNN and multiple skip connections [19]. Upon 10-fold cross-validation, they have achieved training accuracy of 97% and approximately 90% validation accuracy.…”
Section: A Physiological Origin Of Cardiac Auscultationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although multiple analysis were performed adopting several feature extraction and classifier combinations, MFCC-DWT based conjoined features demonstrated the best performance, giving 97.4%, 97.9% and 92.1% accuracy respectively, on KNN, SVM and DNN classifiers. Another work proposing a novel deep WaveNet architecture has achieved a training accuracy of 97% and validation accuracy of 90% for 5 class CVD classification [19].Furthermore, two recent studies on the classification of HVDs have utilized this dataset dropping the MVP class. The first work has achieved the mean accuracy of 95.13% using wavelet synchrosqueezing transform function (WSST) for extracting the magnitude and phase features from the PCG and classified the signals with the Random Forest (RF) classifier [23] while the second one contains several complex processing steps.…”
Section: Comparison With the Existing Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The CT-based time-frequency features obtained from PCG and composite classification model yielded an overall accuracy value of 98.33% [ 13 ]. Oh et al [ 79 ] have proposed a waveNet-based DNN model for the classification of HVAs using PCG recordings and obtained an overall accuracy value of 98.20%. The proposed approach demonstrated higher classification performance as compared to the existing algorithms for automated HVA detection.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table IV shows a comparison of class-wise accuracy between deep wavenet model [24] and the proposed trimodal system. The proposed architecture exhibits better performance in each class.…”
Section: Comparison With Other State Of the Artsmentioning
confidence: 99%