2013
DOI: 10.1186/1687-6180-2013-61
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of ground moving targets using bicepstrum-based features extracted from Micro-Doppler radar signatures

Abstract: In this article, a novel bicepstrum-based approach is suggested for ground moving radar target classification. Distinctive classification features were extracted from short-time backscattering bispectrum estimates of the micro-Doppler signature. Real radar data were obtained using surveillance Doppler microwave radar operating at 34 GHz. Classifier performance was studied in detail using the Gaussian Mixture Mode and Maximum Likelihood decision making rule, and the results were verified on a multilayer percept… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the past few decades a plethora of features have been proposed for use in micro‐Doppler classification. These features may be divided into four basic types: (i) physical features [7–9], which aim at deriving quantities relating to the physical characteristics of targets and their motion; (ii) transform‐based features [10–12], which utilise the coefficients of transforms, such as the discrete cosine transform (DCT), as features; (iv) component analysis features [13–15], where the basis computed from algorithms such as principle component analysis (PCA) are defined as features; and (iv) speech features [16–18], which have typically been designed for and used to process speech signals, but have yielded good results in micro‐Doppler classification as well. Combined, hundreds of features may potentially be extracted from micro‐Doppler signatures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past few decades a plethora of features have been proposed for use in micro‐Doppler classification. These features may be divided into four basic types: (i) physical features [7–9], which aim at deriving quantities relating to the physical characteristics of targets and their motion; (ii) transform‐based features [10–12], which utilise the coefficients of transforms, such as the discrete cosine transform (DCT), as features; (iv) component analysis features [13–15], where the basis computed from algorithms such as principle component analysis (PCA) are defined as features; and (iv) speech features [16–18], which have typically been designed for and used to process speech signals, but have yielded good results in micro‐Doppler classification as well. Combined, hundreds of features may potentially be extracted from micro‐Doppler signatures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, another fruitful future research direction is a comparison of the performance of a DCNN and all combinations of existing feature-based schemes [6,7,8,9,10,11,12] to investigate the optimum performing methods for micro-Doppler signature-based human activity classification. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the unique micro-Doppler signatures from human activities enabled diverse and extensive research on human detection and activity classification/analysis using radar sensors [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. More specifically, the authors of [6] extracted direct micro-Doppler features such as bandwidth and Doppler period, the authors of [7] applied linear predictive code coefficients, and the authors of [8] applied minimum divergence approaches for robust classification under a low signal-to-noise ratio environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, [18] applied Log-Gabor filters to extract features from time-frequency domain signals. Researchers also used features based on higher-order spectral processing extracted from Doppler echo signals [19], [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%