1992
DOI: 10.1016/s0723-2020(11)80114-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of Fluorescent Soft Rot Pseudomonas Bacteria, Including P. marginalis Strains, Using Whole Cell Fatty Acid Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…marginalis is regarded as one of many oxidase positive, soft rot fluorescent pseudomonads (Lelliott et al 1966;Janse et al 1992). Recently, based on 16S rRNA analysis, P. marginalis has been placed in the P. fluorescens group (Anzai et al 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…marginalis is regarded as one of many oxidase positive, soft rot fluorescent pseudomonads (Lelliott et al 1966;Janse et al 1992). Recently, based on 16S rRNA analysis, P. marginalis has been placed in the P. fluorescens group (Anzai et al 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As regards P. marginalis (sensu stricto), this fluorescent pseudomonad serves as a typical species indicating the positive pectolytic activity. Potato-macerating isolates among the fluorescent pseudomonads represented a continuum of phenotypes from P. fluorescent to Pseudomonas putida (Sands & Hankin 1975;Janse et al 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…tolaasii has routinely been distinguished from other pseudomonads by its ability to cause dark brown discolorations on mushrooms and by a positive WLA with P. reactans (18,36,46,61,65). However, an earlier study (12) identified a mushroom farm isolate, Pseudomonas NZI7, as being WLAϩ (with P. reactans) and causing discoloration of A. bisporus tissue comparable to that caused by P. tolaasii.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example a new isolate that falls somewhere within the "fluorescens supercluster" would be expected to share a limited set of features exhibited by all the members of that group, even though it may not be possible to tell within which species or biovar of that group the new isolate belongs. As an illustration from a risk assessment perspective, a new isolate that is identified as a biovar of P. fluorescens might merit further inquiry and/or testing, since the subgroup, P. fluorescens biovar II, has embedded within it some members previously known as P. marginalis, which is a known plant pathogen (Janse et al, 1992). Since not all P. marginalis-like isolates fit within the boundaries of P. fluorescens biovar II, one cannot automatically assume that only biovar II isolates are likely to be pathogenic, nor can one assume that biovar II isolates must be pathogenic, but the direction of inquiry can be focused by knowing that the isolate falls within the "supercluster" and can be enhanced if own can narrow down that information to one of the categorized biovars of P. fluorescens.…”
Section: Use Of Taxonomy As a Basis For Further Inquiriesmentioning
confidence: 99%